MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ana.410360311

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of neurology · 1994

Voluntary movement at the elbow in spastic hemiparesis.

Fellows S J, Kaus C, Thilmann A F

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The relative importance of hyperreflexia and paresis in disturbances of voluntary arm movement was studied in a group of patients (n = 25) with spasticity arising from a unilateral ischemic cerebral lesion. Patient performance was evaluated against data obtained from normal subjects (n = 15). Spastic patients achieved lower maximum movement velocities during flexion or extension than did normal subjects. The more marked the paresis of the elbow flexor and extensor muscles of the patients, relative to the strength of the normal subjects, the greater was this reduction in maximum velocity. For a given velocity, however, the time taken to complete a movement and the time to reach the peak velocity were normal. No relationship was found between the degree of impairment of voluntary movement and the level of passive muscle hypertonia in the antagonist. Although overactivity of the antagonist muscle may play some role in disturbance of movements made at low velocities without an opposing load, antagonist activity during movements made against a load (i.e., under more natural conditions) was at or below normal levels, even in those patients with the most marked passive muscle hypertonia. It is concluded that agonist muscle paresis, rather than antagonist muscle hypertonia, plays the dominant role in the disturbance of voluntary elbow movement following stroke.

Для цитирования: Fellows S J, Kaus C, Thilmann A F. Voluntary movement at the elbow in spastic hemiparesis.. Annals of neurology. 1994. DOI: 10.1002/ana.410360311.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.