[Recurrent pericardial effusion as first manifestation of Erdheim-Chester disease].
Аннотация
HISTORY AND ADMISSION FINDINGS: A 65-year-old woman presented with reduced general condition and dyspnoea that was progressive over the last months. Clinical findings revealed an exophthalmus on the right, xanthelasm and mild peripheral oedema. Previously, a pericardiocentesis had been performed due to a large pericardial effusion. A previous CT scan showed a mass attached to the pericardium extending through the atrio-ventricular groove and a thickened aorta. In addition, a retroperitoneal fibrosis and an occlusion of both Aa. iliacae internae were found.
INVESTIGATIONS: The ECG showed sinus rhythm. Laboratory findings demonstrated a microcytic anemia and a renal failure. Chest radiography showed a large cardiac silhouette, while the transthoracic echocardiography revealed a recurrent large pericardial effusion. A PET/CT scan of the chest and abdomen showed a tissue infiltration of the retroperitoneal structures, a mass surrounding the right coronary artery and the right orbita. Finally, a femur biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of Erdheim-Chester disease.
DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND COURSE: With the diagnosis Erdheim-Chester disease we started a high dose immunsuppressive therapy using glucocorticoids and interferon-a. Tumour size slightly decreased during the following 2 months, however the patient developed a severe urosepsis and died from multiorgan failure.
CONCLUSIONS
We report a case of an Erdheim-Chester disease with cardiovascular involvement primarily diagnosed due to a recurrent large pericardial effusion. In case of cardial tumors with interatrial septum or coronary artery involvement together with cerebral manifestations, an Erdheim-Chester disease should be taken into account.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.