MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/02643290500538364

Медицинская библиотека · Cognitive neuropsychology · 2006

Evaluation of lexically and nonlexically based reading treatment in a deep dyslexic.

Stadie Nicole, Rilling Eva

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The aim of the single case study was to evaluate two different treatment procedures to improve reading skills with a German-speaking deep dyslexic. Generally, in treatment studies for deep dyslexia, retraining of grapheme-phoneme correspondences is described, but hardly any treatment focuses on reactivating residual functions of the semantic-lexical route. This strategy was explored here with an experimentally presented priming paradigm, to implicitly strengthen residual skills of lexical access with semantically/phonologically related primes (lexically based treatment). In contrast, grapheme-phoneme associations and blending were explicitly relearned during a nonlexically based treatment. Stimuli were controlled for part of speech, word length, and frequency. A cross-over design to identify item- and treatment-specific effects for both procedures was applied. Results indicate positive outcomes with respect to treatment-specific effects for both procedures, generalization to untrained items, and a transfer task after the nonlexically based procedure. All effects remained stable in the follow-up assessment. Implications for theoretically/empirically generated expectations about treatment outcomes are discussed.

Для цитирования: Stadie Nicole, Rilling Eva. Evaluation of lexically and nonlexically based reading treatment in a deep dyslexic.. Cognitive neuropsychology. 2006. DOI: 10.1080/02643290500538364.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.