MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4314/ahs.v21i1.36

Медицинская библиотека · African health sciences · 2021

The impact of selenium administration on severe sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Kong Lin, Wu Qing, Liu Bo

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of selenium administration to treat severe sepsis or septic shock remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the impact of selenium administration on severe sepsis or septic shock.

METHODS

We search PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through May 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of selenium administration on severe sepsis or septic shock. Meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model.

RESULTS

Five RCTs involving 1482 patients are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group in septic patients, selenium administration is not associated with reduced 28-day mortality (RR=0.93; 95% CI=0.73 to 1.19; P=0.58), but results in substantially decreased all-cause mortality (RR=0.78; 95% CI=0.63 to 0.98; P=0.03) and length of hospital stay (MD=-3.09; 95% CI=-5.68 to -0.50; P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Selenium administration results in notable decrease in all-cause mortality and length of hospital stay, but shows no substantial influence on the 28-day mortality, length of ICU stay, duration of vasopressor therapy, the incidence of acute renal failure, adverse events, and serious adverse events for septic patients.

Для цитирования: Kong Lin, Wu Qing, Liu Bo. The impact of selenium administration on severe sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. African health sciences. 2021. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v21i1.36.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.