MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/088307380401900601

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of child neurology · 2004

Infantile spasms: therapy and outcome.

Riikonen Raili

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Up-to date information about corticotropin (ACTH) in the treatment of infantile spasms and evaluation of the long-term outcome was provided to answer questions about (1) the efficacy of doses of ACTH in comparison with other drugs, especially with vigabatrin, and the efficacy in patients with tuberous sclerosis; (2) tolerability; and (3) long-term outcome. In two studies, high doses were not more effective than low doses but were more effective in another study. In the follow-up of the studies, there was no difference. In an open, randomized, prospective study, the efficacy and relapse rates of ACTH and vigabatrin treatment did not differ significantly. The high response rates in tuberous sclerosis complex were similar. Both drugs had severe side effects. In the long-term follow-up of 20 to 35 years, one third of the patients died, the intellectual outcome of the remaining patients was normal or slightly subnormal, and one quarter and one third of the patients were seizure free. ACTH should be the first choice for treatment of infantile spasms. The side effects of ACTH, unlike those of vigabatrin, are well known, treatable, and reversible. However, an open, prospective study to compare the efficacy, relapse rate, and long-term outcome of treatment with ACTH and vigabatrin is urgently needed. The frequency of visual field defects after vigabatrin therapy should be evaluated.

Для цитирования: Riikonen Raili. Infantile spasms: therapy and outcome.. Journal of child neurology. 2004. DOI: 10.1177/088307380401900601.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.