Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique · 2003
[Pharmacological treatment of post-traumatic behavioural disorders].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Richard I, Perrouin-Verbe B, Rome J, Bernat C, Mathé J F
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Literature review of the data concerning pharmacologic treatment of post-traumatic behavioural disorders. This review is limited to the treatment of agitation, excitation, mood lability, hostility and agressivity as defined by the NRS and excludes pharmacologic treatment of mental slowness, cognitive disorders and depression.
METHODS: Medline interrogation using keywords Traumatic Brain Injury, Agitation, Agressivity, Behaviour, Pharmacology, Neuroleptics, Benzodiazepines, Carbamazepine, Valproate, Buspirone, SSRI, Propanolol, Methylphenidate and review of recent contents. The data finally includes 29 original studies.
RESULTS: The overall level of evidence is quite low as the data mainly consist in open studies and case reports. These data and data from reviews or didactic articles suggest the efficiency of a variety of treatments. Mood-stabilizing antiepileptics, and specially carbamazepine constitute together with SSRI antidepressants the first choices. Some data suggest efficiency of buspirone, methylphenidate and atypic neuroleptics. Lithium requires close monitoring but is probably efficient. It is difficult to conclude concerning propanolol.
CONCLUSION: The available data is in favour of the use of CBZ and SSRI antidepressants. Further studies are required. It is necessary to establish clear evidence of the efficiency of CBZ and assess the effects of methylphenidate, which is almost not prescribed in France.
METHODS: Medline interrogation using keywords Traumatic Brain Injury, Agitation, Agressivity, Behaviour, Pharmacology, Neuroleptics, Benzodiazepines, Carbamazepine, Valproate, Buspirone, SSRI, Propanolol, Methylphenidate and review of recent contents. The data finally includes 29 original studies.
RESULTS: The overall level of evidence is quite low as the data mainly consist in open studies and case reports. These data and data from reviews or didactic articles suggest the efficiency of a variety of treatments. Mood-stabilizing antiepileptics, and specially carbamazepine constitute together with SSRI antidepressants the first choices. Some data suggest efficiency of buspirone, methylphenidate and atypic neuroleptics. Lithium requires close monitoring but is probably efficient. It is difficult to conclude concerning propanolol.
CONCLUSION: The available data is in favour of the use of CBZ and SSRI antidepressants. Further studies are required. It is necessary to establish clear evidence of the efficiency of CBZ and assess the effects of methylphenidate, which is almost not prescribed in France.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAggressionAnti-Anxiety AgentsAntidepressive AgentsAntimanic AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsBrain InjuriesCarbamazepineCentral Nervous System StimulantsDouble-Blind MethodHumansLithium CompoundsMental DisordersMethylphenidatePlacebosProspective StudiesPsychomotor AgitationPsychotropic DrugsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesTranquilizing Agents