Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2018
Inotropic and lusitropic effects of levosimendan and milrinone assessed by strain echocardiography-A randomised trial.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fredholm M, Jörgensen K, Houltz E, Ricksten S-E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We compared the direct inotropic and lusitropic effects of two inodilators, milrinone and levosimendan in patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
METHODS: In this randomised, blinded study, 31 patients with normal LV function, were randomised to either levosimendan (0.1 and 0.2 μg/kg/min, n = 15) or milrinone (0.4 and 0.8 μg/kg/min, n = 16) after aortic valve replacement. The effects on LV performance, LV strain, systolic (SR-S) and early diastolic (SR-E) strain rate were assessed by a pulmonary artery catheter and transoesophageal two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography of the LV inferior wall. To circumvent the inodilator-induced hemodynamic changes on LV systolic and diastolic deformation, central venous pressure (CVP), systolic artery pressure (SAP), and heart rate were maintained constant by colloid infusion, phenylephrine-induced vasoconstriction and atrial pacing, respectively, during drug infusion.
RESULTS: Both inotropic agents induced a dose-dependent increase in cardiac index and stroke volume index by approximately 20% at the highest infusion rates with no differences between groups (P = .139 and .249, respectively). CVP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, SAP and heart rate were maintained constant in both groups. LV strain and SR-S increased with both agents, dose-dependently, by 17%-18% and 25%-30%, respectively, at the highest infusion rates, with no difference between groups (P = .434 and .284, respectively). Both agents improved early LV relaxation with no differences between groups (P = .637). At the higher doses, both agents increased SR-E by 30%.
CONCLUSIONS: At clinically relevant infusion rates and a certain increase in LV performance the direct inotropic and lusitropic of milrinone and levosimendan were comparable.
METHODS: In this randomised, blinded study, 31 patients with normal LV function, were randomised to either levosimendan (0.1 and 0.2 μg/kg/min, n = 15) or milrinone (0.4 and 0.8 μg/kg/min, n = 16) after aortic valve replacement. The effects on LV performance, LV strain, systolic (SR-S) and early diastolic (SR-E) strain rate were assessed by a pulmonary artery catheter and transoesophageal two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography of the LV inferior wall. To circumvent the inodilator-induced hemodynamic changes on LV systolic and diastolic deformation, central venous pressure (CVP), systolic artery pressure (SAP), and heart rate were maintained constant by colloid infusion, phenylephrine-induced vasoconstriction and atrial pacing, respectively, during drug infusion.
RESULTS: Both inotropic agents induced a dose-dependent increase in cardiac index and stroke volume index by approximately 20% at the highest infusion rates with no differences between groups (P = .139 and .249, respectively). CVP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, SAP and heart rate were maintained constant in both groups. LV strain and SR-S increased with both agents, dose-dependently, by 17%-18% and 25%-30%, respectively, at the highest infusion rates, with no difference between groups (P = .434 and .284, respectively). Both agents improved early LV relaxation with no differences between groups (P = .637). At the higher doses, both agents increased SR-E by 30%.
CONCLUSIONS: At clinically relevant infusion rates and a certain increase in LV performance the direct inotropic and lusitropic of milrinone and levosimendan were comparable.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisCardiac OutputCardiotonic AgentsCatheterization, PeripheralDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodEchocardiography, TransesophagealFemaleHeartHeart RateHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMilrinoneMyocardial ContractionPulmonary Wedge PressureSimendanStroke Volume