La Medicina del lavoro · 2003
[Significance of biological indicators of mercury exposure].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Apostoli P, Mangili A, Alessio L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: It was considered appropriate to update of the significance and use of the different mercury exposure indicators.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the this paper was to correctly select biological media and sampling time and to understand the toxic kinetics of mercury for assessment of accurate biological monitoring.
RESULTS: It was confirmed that mercury in blood (B-Hg) is a good indicator of recent exposure, while urinary mercury (U-Hg) indicates current exposure when mercury reaches the renal steady state. B-Hg values are greatly influenced by fish consumption, while the variables influencing U-Hg values are amalgam fillings, commercial gamma-globulin preparations, vaccines, topical remedies, environmental pollution and hobbies, occupational exposure and, partly, fish consumption. The speciation of mercury (Hg0, Hg++, methylmercury and ethylmercury) in biological media, should provide additional and important information in evaluating mercury toxicity.
CONCLUSION: It was stressed that the appropriate choice of exposure indicators has to take account of the different variability factors and the characteristics of the toxic kinetics of mercury. The results of biological monitoring must be compared with references values, which are generally in the order of several micrograms/g creatinine, and limit values such as ACGIH BEI (U-Hg 35 micrograms/g creatinine and B-Hg 15 micrograms/l) or the DFG BAT (U-Hg 100 micrograms/l and B-Hg 25 micrograms/l).
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the this paper was to correctly select biological media and sampling time and to understand the toxic kinetics of mercury for assessment of accurate biological monitoring.
RESULTS: It was confirmed that mercury in blood (B-Hg) is a good indicator of recent exposure, while urinary mercury (U-Hg) indicates current exposure when mercury reaches the renal steady state. B-Hg values are greatly influenced by fish consumption, while the variables influencing U-Hg values are amalgam fillings, commercial gamma-globulin preparations, vaccines, topical remedies, environmental pollution and hobbies, occupational exposure and, partly, fish consumption. The speciation of mercury (Hg0, Hg++, methylmercury and ethylmercury) in biological media, should provide additional and important information in evaluating mercury toxicity.
CONCLUSION: It was stressed that the appropriate choice of exposure indicators has to take account of the different variability factors and the characteristics of the toxic kinetics of mercury. The results of biological monitoring must be compared with references values, which are generally in the order of several micrograms/g creatinine, and limit values such as ACGIH BEI (U-Hg 35 micrograms/g creatinine and B-Hg 15 micrograms/l) or the DFG BAT (U-Hg 100 micrograms/l and B-Hg 25 micrograms/l).