Annals of surgery · 2005
High incidence of thrombosis of the portal venous system after laparoscopic splenectomy: a prospective study with contrast-enhanced CT scan.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ikeda Masataka, Sekimoto Mitsugu, Takiguchi Shuji, Kubota Masaru, Ikenaga Masakazu, Yamamoto Hirofumi, Fujiwara Yoshiyuki, Ohue Masayuki, Yasuda Takushi, Imamura Hiroshi, Tatsuta Masayuki, Yano Masahiko, Furukawa Hiroshi, Monden Morito
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this prospective study were to investigate the true incidence of portal or splenic vein thrombosis (PSVT) after elective laparoscopic splenectomy using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan, and outcome of anticoagulant therapy for PSVT.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although rare, thrombosis of the portal venous system is considered a possible cause of death after splenectomy. The reported incidence of ultrasonographically detected PSVT after elective open splenectomy ranges from 6.3% to 10%.
METHODS: Twenty-two patients underwent laparoscopic splenectomy (LS group), and 21 patients underwent open splenectomy (OS group). Preoperative and postoperative helical CT with contrast were obtained in all patients, and the extent of thrombosis was investigated. Prothrombotic disorder was also determined.
RESULTS: PSVT occurred in 12 (55%) patients of the LS group, but in only 4 (19%) of the OS group. The difference was significant (P = 0.03). Clinical symptoms appeared in 4 of the 12 LS patients. Thrombosis occurred in the intrahepatic portal vein (n = 9), extrahepatic portal vein (n = 2), mesenteric veins (n = 1), proximal splenic vein (n = 4), and distal splenic vein (n = 8). Prothrombotic disorder was diagnosed in 1 patient. Anticoagulant therapy was initiated once the diagnosis was established, and complete recanalization, except for distal splenic vein, was observed without any adverse event. Patients with splenomegaly were at high risk of PSVT.
CONCLUSIONS: PSVT is a more frequent complication of laparoscopic splenectomy than previously reported but can be treated safely following early detection by CT with contrast.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although rare, thrombosis of the portal venous system is considered a possible cause of death after splenectomy. The reported incidence of ultrasonographically detected PSVT after elective open splenectomy ranges from 6.3% to 10%.
METHODS: Twenty-two patients underwent laparoscopic splenectomy (LS group), and 21 patients underwent open splenectomy (OS group). Preoperative and postoperative helical CT with contrast were obtained in all patients, and the extent of thrombosis was investigated. Prothrombotic disorder was also determined.
RESULTS: PSVT occurred in 12 (55%) patients of the LS group, but in only 4 (19%) of the OS group. The difference was significant (P = 0.03). Clinical symptoms appeared in 4 of the 12 LS patients. Thrombosis occurred in the intrahepatic portal vein (n = 9), extrahepatic portal vein (n = 2), mesenteric veins (n = 1), proximal splenic vein (n = 4), and distal splenic vein (n = 8). Prothrombotic disorder was diagnosed in 1 patient. Anticoagulant therapy was initiated once the diagnosis was established, and complete recanalization, except for distal splenic vein, was observed without any adverse event. Patients with splenomegaly were at high risk of PSVT.
CONCLUSIONS: PSVT is a more frequent complication of laparoscopic splenectomy than previously reported but can be treated safely following early detection by CT with contrast.