MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005752

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2014

Safety and effectiveness of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors versus intermediate-acting insulin or placebo for patients with type 2 diabetes failing two oral antihyperglycaemic agents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Tricco Andrea C, Antony Jesmin, Khan Paul A, Ghassemi Marco, Hamid Jemila S, Ashoor Huda, Blondal Erik, Soobiah Charlene, Yu Catherine H, Hutton Brian, Hemmelgarn Brenda R, Moher David, Majumdar Sumit R, Straus Sharon E

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорNetwork Meta-AnalysisПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors versus intermediate-acting insulin for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and poor glycaemic control despite treatment with two oral agents.

SETTING

Studies were multicentre and multinational.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten studies including 2967 patients with T2DM.

INTERVENTIONS: Studies that examined DPP-4 inhibitors compared with each other, intermediate-acting insulin, no treatment or placebo in patients with T2DM.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Secondary outcomes were healthcare utilisation, body weight, fractures, quality of life, microvascular complications, macrovascular complications, all-cause mortality, harms, cost and cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

10 randomised clinical trials with 2967 patients were included after screening 5831 titles and abstracts, and 180 full-text articles. DPP-4 inhibitors significantly reduced HbA1c versus placebo in network meta-analysis (NMA; mean difference (MD) -0.62%, 95% CI -0.93% to -0.33%) and meta-analysis (MD -0.61%, 95% CI -0.81% to -0.41%), respectively. Significant differences in HbA1c were not observed for neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin versus placebo and DPP-4 inhibitors versus NPH insulin in NMA. In meta-analysis, no significant differences were observed between DPP-4 inhibitors and placebo for severe hypoglycaemia, weight gain, cardiovascular disease, overall harms, treatment-related harms and mortality, although patients receiving DPP-4 inhibitors experienced less infections (relative risk 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

DPP-4 inhibitors were superior to placebo in reducing HbA1c levels in adults with T2DM taking at least two oral agents. Compared with placebo, no safety signals were detected with DPP-4 inhibitors and there was a reduced risk of infection. There was no significant difference in HbA1c observed between NPH and placebo or NPH and DPP-4 inhibitors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO # CRD42013003624.

Для цитирования: Tricco Andrea C, Antony Jesmin, Khan Paul A, Ghassemi Marco, Hamid Jemila S, Ashoor Huda, Blondal Erik, Soobiah Charlene, Yu Catherine H, Hutton Brian, Hemmelgarn Brenda R, Moher David, Majumdar Sumit R, Straus Sharon E. Safety and effectiveness of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors versus intermediate-acting insulin or placebo for patients with type 2 diabetes failing two oral antihyperglycaemic agents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.. BMJ open. 2014. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005752.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.