Journal of clinical periodontology · 2003
The systemic immune response is more prominent than the mucosal immune response in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bang In Jae, Kim Min-Seok, Han Yubin, Kim Ga Eun, Lim Jung Eun, Park Ji Yeong, Yoo Jin, Jang Young Seo, Lee Beomhee, Kwak Minjin, Park Soojin, Jang Wonjun, Batjargal Ulziituya, Lee Min Young, Kim Minjeong, Kim Han-Jun, Kim Ha Ryong
Аннотация
AIMS: To examine the efficacy of lofexidine, an alpha2 adrenergic agonist, to suppress opioid withdrawal symptoms in opioid-dependent humans under in-patient laboratory conditions by using a naloxone challenge procedure.
DESIGN: Randomized, within-subject, cross-over design with drug administration taking place under double-blind and triple-dummy conditions.
SETTING: A 14-bed in-patient hospital research unit dedicated to the conduct of behavioral pharmacology studies.
PARTICIPANTS: Eight healthy adult volunteers (two female/six male) with histories of polysubstance abuse and current physical dependence on opioids.
INTERVENTION: Participants were stabilized onto methadone and maintained on 30 mg/day, p.o. throughout the study. Oral placebo, lofexidine (0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 mg, p.o.) and clonidine (0.1 and 0.2 mg, p.o.) were each tested as pre-treatments once in combination with each of three intramuscular naloxone doses (0, 0.1 and 0.3 mg, i.m.) during 18 separate experimental sessions.
MEASUREMENTS: An array of physiological indices (e.g. heart rate, blood pressure, pupil diameter) as well as a number of subjective and observer-rating scales sensitive to opioid withdrawal effects.
FINDINGS: As expected, lofexidine and clonidine both produced dose-related decreases in blood pressure and heart rate but few subjective effects; naloxone increased opioid withdrawal signs and symptoms in a dose- and time-dependent fashion. Although both lofexidine and clonidine reduced the cardiovascular response to naloxone challenge, close inspection of the data reveal that this occurred only to the extent that baseline physiological parameters were reduced, while neither drug significantly modified the overall magnitude of the response to naloxone. Moreover, neither lofexidine nor clonidine suppressed the subjective discomfort of opioid withdrawal or significantly reduced other autonomic signs of opioid withdrawal, such as lacrimation or rhinorrhea.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that lofexidine is well tolerated even at supratherapeutic acute doses. However, its failure to modify most signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal suggest that its effective use in spontaneous withdrawal will require concomitant medications for improved therapeutic response.
DESIGN: Randomized, within-subject, cross-over design with drug administration taking place under double-blind and triple-dummy conditions.
SETTING: A 14-bed in-patient hospital research unit dedicated to the conduct of behavioral pharmacology studies.
PARTICIPANTS: Eight healthy adult volunteers (two female/six male) with histories of polysubstance abuse and current physical dependence on opioids.
INTERVENTION: Participants were stabilized onto methadone and maintained on 30 mg/day, p.o. throughout the study. Oral placebo, lofexidine (0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 mg, p.o.) and clonidine (0.1 and 0.2 mg, p.o.) were each tested as pre-treatments once in combination with each of three intramuscular naloxone doses (0, 0.1 and 0.3 mg, i.m.) during 18 separate experimental sessions.
MEASUREMENTS: An array of physiological indices (e.g. heart rate, blood pressure, pupil diameter) as well as a number of subjective and observer-rating scales sensitive to opioid withdrawal effects.
FINDINGS: As expected, lofexidine and clonidine both produced dose-related decreases in blood pressure and heart rate but few subjective effects; naloxone increased opioid withdrawal signs and symptoms in a dose- and time-dependent fashion. Although both lofexidine and clonidine reduced the cardiovascular response to naloxone challenge, close inspection of the data reveal that this occurred only to the extent that baseline physiological parameters were reduced, while neither drug significantly modified the overall magnitude of the response to naloxone. Moreover, neither lofexidine nor clonidine suppressed the subjective discomfort of opioid withdrawal or significantly reduced other autonomic signs of opioid withdrawal, such as lacrimation or rhinorrhea.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that lofexidine is well tolerated even at supratherapeutic acute doses. However, its failure to modify most signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal suggest that its effective use in spontaneous withdrawal will require concomitant medications for improved therapeutic response.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultCell Adhesion MoleculesConnective TissueGingivaGingivitisGranulation TissueHumansImmunity, MucosalImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin J-ChainsImmunoglobulinsIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Interleukin-8Middle AgedMucoproteinsNeutrophilsPeriodontitisPeriodontiumPlasma CellsReceptors, Lymphocyte HomingVascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1