Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2007
Variation in community intervention programmes and consequences for children and families: the example of Sure Start Local Programmes.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Melhuish Edward, Belsky Jay, Anning Angela, Ball Mog, Barnes Jacqueline, Romaniuk Helena, Leyland Alastair, NESS Research Team
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: An area-based initiative, Sure Start Local Programmes (SSLPs), was established by the UK government to reduce social exclusion through improving the well-being of children aged 0-3 years and their families in disadvantaged communities; a true community intervention in that all children under four and their families in specified areas served as targets of universal services. A national evaluation examined the links between variation in programme implementation and effectiveness.
METHODS: Data gathered from multiple sources produced measures of implementation in terms of proficiency, services and staffing. Measures of programme impact on child/parenting outcomes derived from multilevel models, controlling for child, family and area characteristics, were identified to demonstrate programme effectiveness.
RESULTS: Some modest linkage between programme implementation (e.g., proficiency, empowerment of parents and staff, identification of users) and effectiveness for child and parenting outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall proficiency and specific aspects of implementation may influence effectiveness, which should guide the design of other child, family and community services.
METHODS: Data gathered from multiple sources produced measures of implementation in terms of proficiency, services and staffing. Measures of programme impact on child/parenting outcomes derived from multilevel models, controlling for child, family and area characteristics, were identified to demonstrate programme effectiveness.
RESULTS: Some modest linkage between programme implementation (e.g., proficiency, empowerment of parents and staff, identification of users) and effectiveness for child and parenting outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall proficiency and specific aspects of implementation may influence effectiveness, which should guide the design of other child, family and community services.