MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/09546634.2013.851921

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of dermatological treatment · 2014

Patterns of ambulatory care usage and leading treatments for rosacea.

Davis Scott A, Feldman Steven R

Редакционная статьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Millions of rosacea sufferers are not being treated, and the reasons they do not get treatment are not well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine the main reasons for visit, providers seen and treatments used for rosacea.

METHODS

We used data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for 1993-2010, tabulating the leading reasons for visit, providers seen and treatments used in rosacea visits.

RESULTS

There were 1 750 000 visits per year for rosacea. The leading reasons for visit were other diseases of the skin (25.3%), skin rash (19.6%), and discoloration or abnormal pigmentation (14.7%). Dermatologists managed 72.4% of visits. The most common treatments used were topical metronidazole (29.3%), tetracycline (11.0%), minocycline (8.5%), doxycycline (7.9%), and oral metronidazole (6.9%).

LIMITATIONS: Some reasons for visit were too nonspecific to provide good insight on why the patient made a visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Dermatologists manage rosacea most commonly, but primary care physicians need the proper training to diagnose it correctly. Improved strategies to reach untreated people with rosacea are needed.

Для цитирования: Davis Scott A, Feldman Steven R. Patterns of ambulatory care usage and leading treatments for rosacea.. The Journal of dermatological treatment. 2014. DOI: 10.3109/09546634.2013.851921.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.