Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2010
Crystallization tendency of active pharmaceutical ingredients following rapid solvent evaporation--classification and comparison with crystallization tendency from undercooled melts.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Van Eerdenbrugh Bernard, Baird Jared A, Taylor Lynne S
Аннотация
In this study, the crystallization behavior of a variety of compounds was studied following rapid solvent evaporation using spin coating. Initial screening to determine model compound suitability was performed using a structurally diverse set of 51 compounds in three different solvent systems [dichloromethane (DCM), a 1:1 (w/w) dichloromethane/ethanol mixture (MIX), and ethanol (EtOH)]. Of this starting set of 153 drug-solvent combinations, 93 (40 compounds) were selected for further evaluation based on solubility, chemical solution stability, and processability criteria. These systems were spin coated and their crystallization was monitored using polarized light microscopy (7 days, dry conditions). The crystallization behavior of the samples could be classified as rapid (Class I: 39 cases), intermediate (Class II: 23 cases), or slow (Class III: 31 cases). The solvent system employed influenced the classification outcome for only four of the compounds. The various compounds showed very diverse crystallization behavior. Upon comparison of classification results with those of a previous study, where cooling from the melt was used as a preparation technique, a good similarity was found whereby 68% of the cases were identically classified. Multivariate analysis was performed using a set of relevant physicochemical compound characteristics. It was found that a number of these parameters tended to differ between the different classes. These could be further interpreted in terms of the nature of the crystallization process. Additional multivariate analysis on the separate classes of compounds indicated some potential in predicting the crystallization tendency of a given compound.