The Medical journal of Australia · 1993
Placebo-controlled trial of enteric coated aspirin in coronary bypass graft patients. Effect on graft patency.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hockings B E, Ireland M A, Gotch-Martin K F, Taylor R R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether slow-release enteric coated aspirin (100 mg daily), commenced before operation, improves the patency of saphenous vein (SV) coronary artery bypass grafts at six months.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study at a teaching hospital.
RESULTS: One hundred and forty patients were randomly allocated to receive enteric coated aspirin or matching placebo. Similar groups of 50 (aspirin) and 52 (placebo) subjects completed the six months follow-up and had an angiogram to assess patency. Five patients treated with aspirin and nine who received placebo had at least one occluded SV graft; the distal ends of 6 of 128 SV grafts in aspirin-treated patients (4.7%) and 13 of 145 SV grafts in patients in the placebo group (9.0%) were occluded--the difference was not significant. An arterial graft was occluded in one other patient in each group (3% of arterial grafts). There was more postoperative blood loss, on average, in patients treated with aspirin, but the difference was not significant. Only one patient was withdrawn from long-term therapy because of possible gastrointestinal symptoms; most withdrawals from the trial were necessitated by commencement of aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy for musculo-skeletal disorders.
CONCLUSIONS: The coronary bypass graft occlusion rate six months after surgery was low, and was lower on average in aspirin treated subjects but not significantly so. Long-term treatment with low-dose aspirin is recommended unless contraindicated.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study at a teaching hospital.
RESULTS: One hundred and forty patients were randomly allocated to receive enteric coated aspirin or matching placebo. Similar groups of 50 (aspirin) and 52 (placebo) subjects completed the six months follow-up and had an angiogram to assess patency. Five patients treated with aspirin and nine who received placebo had at least one occluded SV graft; the distal ends of 6 of 128 SV grafts in aspirin-treated patients (4.7%) and 13 of 145 SV grafts in patients in the placebo group (9.0%) were occluded--the difference was not significant. An arterial graft was occluded in one other patient in each group (3% of arterial grafts). There was more postoperative blood loss, on average, in patients treated with aspirin, but the difference was not significant. Only one patient was withdrawn from long-term therapy because of possible gastrointestinal symptoms; most withdrawals from the trial were necessitated by commencement of aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy for musculo-skeletal disorders.
CONCLUSIONS: The coronary bypass graft occlusion rate six months after surgery was low, and was lower on average in aspirin treated subjects but not significantly so. Long-term treatment with low-dose aspirin is recommended unless contraindicated.