Clinical cardiology · 1997
Contraction-excitation feedback in human atrial fibrillation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Antoniou A, Milonas D, Kanakakis J, Rokas S, Sideris D A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Contraction-excitation feedback, that is, electrophysiologic changes that are caused or preceded by mechanical changes of the myocardium, has been extensively studied in the ventricles. The role of contraction-excitation feedback in the atria, and more particularly in the genesis and maintenance of atrial fibrillation, has been less adequately investigated.
HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the present study was to determine whether increased right atrial pressure (RAP) facilitates the induction of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with a history of lone AF.
METHODS: Sixteen patients with a history of paroxysmal AF but without structural heart disease were included in the study. All patients underwent electrophysiologic study at both a lower (3.1 +/- 2.0 mmHg) and (in 13 cases) a higher (6.4 +/- 2.5 mmHg) RAP. "Higher" was considered the pressure following rapid (in about 30 min) intravenous administration of normal saline or before the administration of a diuretic.
RESULTS: Rapid atrial pacing induced AF in 19 of 29 attempts. At a lower pressure, rapid pacing induced brief (3 s to 3 min) AF in 3 of 16 patients, long-lasting (> 3 min) AF in 3 of 16 patients, and no AF in 10 of 16 patients. At a higher pressure, brief AF was induced in 3 of 10 patients in whom no AF could be induced at a lower pressure, and long-lasting AF in 10 patients in whom either brief AF (3 cases) or no AF (7 cases) was induced at a lower pressure. In 11 patients, in whom Wenckebach periodicity was determined at both higher and lower pressure, the critical cycle length at which atrioventricular block appeared was significantly (p < 0.001, paired t-test) longer (349.1 +/- 44.4 ms, i.e., +15.5 +/- 11.3 ms) at higher than at lower atrial pressure (333.6 +/- 41.0 ms). In nine patients, in whom Wenckebach periodicity was determined and two rhythms occurred at different pressures, the critical cycle length was 332.2 +/- 45.8 ms when associated with sinus rhythm, and significantly (p < 0.01) longer (344.4 +/- 48.0 ms, i.e., +12.2 +/- 8.3 ms) when associated with induction of AF.
CONCLUSION: In patients with lone atrial fibrillation, modest increases in atrial pressure may facilitate the induction of atrial fibrillation.
HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the present study was to determine whether increased right atrial pressure (RAP) facilitates the induction of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with a history of lone AF.
METHODS: Sixteen patients with a history of paroxysmal AF but without structural heart disease were included in the study. All patients underwent electrophysiologic study at both a lower (3.1 +/- 2.0 mmHg) and (in 13 cases) a higher (6.4 +/- 2.5 mmHg) RAP. "Higher" was considered the pressure following rapid (in about 30 min) intravenous administration of normal saline or before the administration of a diuretic.
RESULTS: Rapid atrial pacing induced AF in 19 of 29 attempts. At a lower pressure, rapid pacing induced brief (3 s to 3 min) AF in 3 of 16 patients, long-lasting (> 3 min) AF in 3 of 16 patients, and no AF in 10 of 16 patients. At a higher pressure, brief AF was induced in 3 of 10 patients in whom no AF could be induced at a lower pressure, and long-lasting AF in 10 patients in whom either brief AF (3 cases) or no AF (7 cases) was induced at a lower pressure. In 11 patients, in whom Wenckebach periodicity was determined at both higher and lower pressure, the critical cycle length at which atrioventricular block appeared was significantly (p < 0.001, paired t-test) longer (349.1 +/- 44.4 ms, i.e., +15.5 +/- 11.3 ms) at higher than at lower atrial pressure (333.6 +/- 41.0 ms). In nine patients, in whom Wenckebach periodicity was determined and two rhythms occurred at different pressures, the critical cycle length was 332.2 +/- 45.8 ms when associated with sinus rhythm, and significantly (p < 0.01) longer (344.4 +/- 48.0 ms, i.e., +12.2 +/- 8.3 ms) when associated with induction of AF.
CONCLUSION: In patients with lone atrial fibrillation, modest increases in atrial pressure may facilitate the induction of atrial fibrillation.