Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2014
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for nonobese type II diabetes mellitus in Asian patients.
Контролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Malapan Kirubakaran, Goel Rajat, Tai Chi-Ming, Kao Yu-Hsi, Chang Po-Chih, Huang Chih-Kun
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The beneficial role of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2 DM) in morbidly obese patients has been established; however, there is scant evidence supporting its effectiveness in nonobese T2 DM Asian patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of LRYGB in nonobese T2 DM patients and elucidate the predictors of DM remission after one year follow-up.
METHODS: Between June 2009 and May 2011, twenty-nine nonobese (body mass index (BMI)<27 kg/m(2)) Asian patients with T2 DM who underwent LRYGB were enrolled. All patients were prospectively followed up for one year. Baseline demographic characteristics, diabetic status, and clinical and biochemical data were collected preoperatively and one year after LRYGB. DM remission was defined as those with hemoglobin A1 c (HbA1 c)<6.5% without oral hypoglycemic drugs (OHA)/insulin. Outcomes in the DM remission group were compared with the nonremission group and analyzed.
RESULTS: All clinical and biochemical parameters, except uric acid, were significantly improved. DM remission was achieved in eleven patients (37.9%) of whom five (45.5%) were male. Blood glucose, HbA1 c, c-peptide, homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-%B), and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol were the significant variables in patients with DM remission; however, multiple logistic regression showed that only preoperative HOMA-%B (odds ratio (OR) = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.03-1.24) was a predictor for DM remission. Though no mortality was seen, the complication rate was 20.7%, of which 17.3% was related to marginal ulcers.
CONCLUSION: LRYGB resulted in significant clinical and biochemical improvements in nonobese Asian patients, with HOMA-%B indicating β-cell function as the main predictor of T2 DM remission. Appropriate patient selection with better β-cell function and evidence from long-term follow-up may justify this therapeutic approach.
METHODS: Between June 2009 and May 2011, twenty-nine nonobese (body mass index (BMI)<27 kg/m(2)) Asian patients with T2 DM who underwent LRYGB were enrolled. All patients were prospectively followed up for one year. Baseline demographic characteristics, diabetic status, and clinical and biochemical data were collected preoperatively and one year after LRYGB. DM remission was defined as those with hemoglobin A1 c (HbA1 c)<6.5% without oral hypoglycemic drugs (OHA)/insulin. Outcomes in the DM remission group were compared with the nonremission group and analyzed.
RESULTS: All clinical and biochemical parameters, except uric acid, were significantly improved. DM remission was achieved in eleven patients (37.9%) of whom five (45.5%) were male. Blood glucose, HbA1 c, c-peptide, homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-%B), and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol were the significant variables in patients with DM remission; however, multiple logistic regression showed that only preoperative HOMA-%B (odds ratio (OR) = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.03-1.24) was a predictor for DM remission. Though no mortality was seen, the complication rate was 20.7%, of which 17.3% was related to marginal ulcers.
CONCLUSION: LRYGB resulted in significant clinical and biochemical improvements in nonobese Asian patients, with HOMA-%B indicating β-cell function as the main predictor of T2 DM remission. Appropriate patient selection with better β-cell function and evidence from long-term follow-up may justify this therapeutic approach.