Surgical infections · 2009
The use of extended-interval aminoglycoside dosing strategies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe infections encountered in critically ill surgical patients.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mueller Eric W, Boucher Bradley A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Extended-interval dosing strategies have been developed to exploit the concentration-dependent bactericidal activity and time-dependent host toxicity associated with aminoglycoside the therapy. The ability of published extended-interval dosing nomograms to achieve optimal pharmacodynamic endpoints may be limited in certain critically ill surgical patients.
METHODS: Review of pertinent English language literature. Presentation of descriptive, graded recommendations for extended-interval aminoglycoside dosing in critically ill surgical patients.
RESULTS: Aminoglycoside dosing considerations in critically ill surgical patients should attempt to maximize the bacterial and host pharmacodynamic attributes of these agents. Empirically, extended-interval aminoglycoside doses proposed by published nomograms are reasonable for most patients; however, because of clinically meaningful variations in aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics, routine use of published extended-interval aminoglycoside dosing nomograms to determine an appropriate dosage interval is discouraged in many critically ill surgical patients. Critically ill surgical patients receiving extended-interval aminoglycoside dosages should undergo individualized pharmacokinetic analysis to characterize efficiently and more effectively plasma concentration-to-bacterial minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) relationships and determine an appropriate dosing interval, considering site and severity of infection, plasma clearance, and the apparent post-antibiotic effect.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of extended-interval aminoglycoside dosage regimens in critically ill surgical patients should be based on pharmacodynamic endpoints and patient-specific pharmacokinetic assessment.
METHODS: Review of pertinent English language literature. Presentation of descriptive, graded recommendations for extended-interval aminoglycoside dosing in critically ill surgical patients.
RESULTS: Aminoglycoside dosing considerations in critically ill surgical patients should attempt to maximize the bacterial and host pharmacodynamic attributes of these agents. Empirically, extended-interval aminoglycoside doses proposed by published nomograms are reasonable for most patients; however, because of clinically meaningful variations in aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics, routine use of published extended-interval aminoglycoside dosing nomograms to determine an appropriate dosage interval is discouraged in many critically ill surgical patients. Critically ill surgical patients receiving extended-interval aminoglycoside dosages should undergo individualized pharmacokinetic analysis to characterize efficiently and more effectively plasma concentration-to-bacterial minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) relationships and determine an appropriate dosing interval, considering site and severity of infection, plasma clearance, and the apparent post-antibiotic effect.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of extended-interval aminoglycoside dosage regimens in critically ill surgical patients should be based on pharmacodynamic endpoints and patient-specific pharmacokinetic assessment.