The Clinical journal of pain · 2005
Working through the pain: a controlled study of the impact of persistent pain on performing a computer task.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Harman Katherine, Ruyak Peggy
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: A large percentage of employees experience persistent pain while at work. This situation can become costly to employers with large amounts of lost production-time, absenteeism, and long-term disability. The link or transition between working through (ignoring) pain and disabling pain is unknown. This paper presents the results of a controlled study examining the impact of persistent pain on performance in a working population. Benefits of early detection are discussed.
METHODS: This was a controlled, repeated measures study using 3 types of measures: questionnaires (pain, pain anxiety, daily memory, and attention mistakes); actigraphic monitoring to assure the absence of sleep deprivation; and the Performance Assessment Battery, a computer-based series of tests. Participants were studied during 3 time periods (9:00 AM, 3:00 PM, and 9:00 PM).
RESULTS: Forty participants (20 pain, 20 controls) were studied. For all tasks, pain participants were slower than controls with significant findings on 2 tasks and less accurate with significant differences on 1 task.
DISCUSSION: Unlike other studies that either induced pain or used persons with complex pain conditions, this study used participants with a low level of pain intensity and had a majority still engaged in full-time employment. Our results found that people with persistent low-level pain demonstrate a reduction in performance compared with controls. Our study revealed that using a sensitive tool to detect minor performance deficits could indicate pain interference. The early detection of pain interference would provide an opportunity for prevention programs to have a pre-emptive effect on work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
METHODS: This was a controlled, repeated measures study using 3 types of measures: questionnaires (pain, pain anxiety, daily memory, and attention mistakes); actigraphic monitoring to assure the absence of sleep deprivation; and the Performance Assessment Battery, a computer-based series of tests. Participants were studied during 3 time periods (9:00 AM, 3:00 PM, and 9:00 PM).
RESULTS: Forty participants (20 pain, 20 controls) were studied. For all tasks, pain participants were slower than controls with significant findings on 2 tasks and less accurate with significant differences on 1 task.
DISCUSSION: Unlike other studies that either induced pain or used persons with complex pain conditions, this study used participants with a low level of pain intensity and had a majority still engaged in full-time employment. Our results found that people with persistent low-level pain demonstrate a reduction in performance compared with controls. Our study revealed that using a sensitive tool to detect minor performance deficits could indicate pain interference. The early detection of pain interference would provide an opportunity for prevention programs to have a pre-emptive effect on work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAnalysis of VarianceAnxietyAttentionCase-Control StudiesComputersDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMemoryMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesPainPain MeasurementPsychomotor PerformanceSelf-AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexSleep Wake DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesTask Performance and AnalysisTime FactorsWork