MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/pds.3610

Медицинская библиотека · Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2014

Intensification of antihyperglycemic therapy among patients with incident diabetes: a Surveillance Prevention and Management of Diabetes Mellitus (SUPREME-DM) study.

Raebel Marsha A, Ellis Jennifer L, Schroeder Emily B, Xu Stanley, O'Connor Patrick J, Segal Jodi B, Butler Melissa G, Schmittdiel Julie A, Kirchner H Lester, Goodrich Glenn K, Lawrence Jean M, Nichols Gregory A, Newton Katherine M, Pathak Ram D, Steiner John F

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Antihyperglycemic medication intensification practices among patients with incident diabetes are incompletely understood. We characterized the first intensification the year after oral antihyperglycemic medication initiation among incident diabetes patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study across 11 US health systems included adults identified with incident diabetes between 2005 and 2009 who started oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy or combination therapy within 6 months after diabetes identification. We determined intensification, defined as increased index medication dosage, addition of another oral medication, or switch to/addition of insulin 31-365 days after initial antihyperglycemic dispensing. Cox regression was used to assess intensification for patient, temporal, and system covariates, adjusting for glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a time-dependent variable.

RESULTS

Among 41,233 patients, 33.5% and 45.3% had treatment intensified within 6 and 12 months, respectively. This first intensification was most often with increased index medication dosage (78%), least often with insulin (<1%). HbA1c% was strongly associated with intensification (adjusted hazard ratios [HR] 1.59, 3.62, 4.44, and 5.52 for HbA1c 6.5% to <7%, 7% to <7.5%, 7.5 to <8%, and ≥8%, respectively, all P < 0.001, compared with HbA1c < 6.5%). In patients initially on monotherapy, age modified the HbA1c effect: at HbA1c < 7%, the HR differed little between middle-aged and older patients; at HbA1c ≥ 7%, the HR decreased with older age (e.g., age 40-49 years and HbA1c ≥ 8%: HR 8.14; age ≥ 80 years and HbA1c ≥ 8%: HR 4.44; compared with age ≥ 80 years and HbA1c < 6.5%). Within 1 year, 84.3% achieved HbA1c < 8%; 65.1% achieved HbA1c < 7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians appear to be applying treatment intensification guidelines and individualizing therapy by considering patient age, achieving glycemic control among most incident diabetes patients.

Для цитирования: Raebel Marsha A, Ellis Jennifer L, Schroeder Emily B, Xu Stanley, O'Connor Patrick J, Segal Jodi B, Butler Melissa G, Schmittdiel Julie A, Kirchner H Lester, Goodrich Glenn K, Lawrence Jean M, Nichols Gregory A, Newton Katherine M, Pathak Ram D, Steiner John F. Intensification of antihyperglycemic therapy among patients with incident diabetes: a Surveillance Prevention and Management of Diabetes Mellitus (SUPREME-DM) study.. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2014. DOI: 10.1002/pds.3610.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.