MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/01635581.2013.878737

Медицинская библиотека · Nutrition and cancer · 2014

In vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of Bulbus Fritillariae Cirrhosae and preliminary investigation of its mechanism.

Wang Dong-Dong, Feng Yong, Li Zu, Zhang Li, Wang Shu, Zhang Chao-Yang, Wang Xiao-Xia, Liu Zi-Yu

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Bulbus Fritillariae Cirrhosae (BFC) is widely used in China both for food and folk medicine because of its powerful biological activities. Firstly, this study was designed to examine the antiproliferative activities of the different fractions from BFC in vitro by MTT assay. The results showed that chloroform extracts (CE) and the purified total alkaloids of BFC (TAF) exhibited stronger antiproliferative activity than the other fractions. We further determined the total alkaloids and 3 main alkaloids monomers content of CE and TAF by UV and HPLC-ELSD methods, respectively. Moreover, we assessed the antitumor activity of TAF in vivo and made preliminary investigation of its antitumor mechanism by histological and immunohistochemical staining technique. These results demonstrate that TAF showed significant antitumor activity and low toxicity in vivo. Meanwhile, TAF significantly inhibited tumor angiogenesis and induced apoptosis by improvement of expression level of caspase-3. These results suggest that alkaloids of BFC could hold a good potential for use as an antitumor drug.

Для цитирования: Wang Dong-Dong, Feng Yong, Li Zu, Zhang Li, Wang Shu, Zhang Chao-Yang, Wang Xiao-Xia, Liu Zi-Yu. In vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of Bulbus Fritillariae Cirrhosae and preliminary investigation of its mechanism.. Nutrition and cancer. 2014. DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2013.878737.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.