MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/17483107.2011.553983

Медицинская библиотека · Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology · 2011

An expert review of the scientific literature on independent wheelchair transfers.

Koontz Alicia, Toro Maria, Kankipati Padmaja, Naber Megan, Cooper Rory

СтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform a literature review and seek expert opinion on the relevance and strength of the evidence concerning setup and transfer performance.

METHODS

Scientific literature databases were searched until June 2009 using 43 keywords resulting in 339 articles. These were internally reviewed and narrowed to 41 articles which were formally assessed by 13 external experts. Articles that 80% or more of the reviewers scored as moderately or highly relevant were included in the final results.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles met the relevancy criteria. The aspects of setup that experts felt were addressed to some degree included vertical transfer distance, transferring across a gap and position of the mobility device relative to target destination. None of the 19 articles were scored as having strong to very strong resulting evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a consensus among studies that transferring to a higher surface implies greater exertion of the upper limb. However, there is no evidence concerning how high or low, how close, and how much space is needed next to the target surface so it can be accessible by a majority of wheelchair users.

Для цитирования: Koontz Alicia, Toro Maria, Kankipati Padmaja, Naber Megan, Cooper Rory. An expert review of the scientific literature on independent wheelchair transfers.. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology. 2011. DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2011.553983.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.