MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12178-010-9068-1

Медицинская библиотека · Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2011

Case report: a case review of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome and low back pain.

Simon Jeremy I, Herbison Gerald J, Levy Galit

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The following is a case report which reviews the essential aspects of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) in a patient with long standing back pain and gait dysfunction. The patient was referred to our electrodiagnostics laboratory for a 9-month history of low back pain and difficulty walking following a charity breast cancer walk. A workup including magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, entire spine, and EMG/NCS at another institution were reportedly normal. A detailed history revealed symptoms of proximal weakness and autonomic dysfunction. Physical findings were consistent with proximal weakness, a bilateral gluteus medius gait, and diffusely absent reflexes obtainable in the biceps after 3 s of contraction. Electrical testing revealed an initial low compound muscle action potential amplitude in the deep peroneal nerve recording from the extensor digitorum brevis. Repetitive stimulation at 2 Hz revealed a decremental response of 42% from the 1st response to the 4th response. Following 3 s of exercise, the amplitude increased by 300%. After 30 s of exercise followed by 1 min of rest, there was a return of the decremental response. The history, physical examination, and electrical findings were illustrative of a presynaptic neuromuscular junction disorder, specifically LEMS.

Для цитирования: Simon Jeremy I, Herbison Gerald J, Levy Galit. Case report: a case review of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome and low back pain.. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-010-9068-1.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.