MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1515/tnsci-2019-0017

Медицинская библиотека · Translational neuroscience · 2019

Difference in the Ascending Reticular Activating System Injury Between Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Cerebral Concussion.

Jang Sung Ho, Kim Seong Ho, Lee Han Do

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

We investigated differences in the ascending reticular activating system (ARAS) injuries between patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and cerebral concussion by using diffusion tensor tractography (DTT).

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with mTBI, 29 patients with concussion, and 30 control subjects were recruited. We used DTT to reconstruct the lower ventral and dorsal ARAS, and the upper ARAS. The fractional anisotropy (FA) value and the fiber number (FN) of the lower ventral and dorsal ARAS, and the upper ARAS were determined.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed in the FA values of the lower ventral and dorsal ARAS on both sides between the mTBI and control groups and between the concussion and control groups (p < 0.05). The FN value was significantly different in the lower ventral ARAS on both sides between the concussion and control groups and between the mTBI and concussion groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both the mTBI and concussion patients suffered injuries in the lower ventral and dorsal ARAS, with the concussion patients exhibiting more severe injury in the ventral ARAS than that in the mTBI patients. These results suggest that the terms mTBI and concussion should be used differentially, even though they have used interchangeably for a long time.

Для цитирования: Jang Sung Ho, Kim Seong Ho, Lee Han Do. Difference in the Ascending Reticular Activating System Injury Between Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Cerebral Concussion.. Translational neuroscience. 2019. DOI: 10.1515/tnsci-2019-0017.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.