MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.01.024

Медицинская библиотека · Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2012

Antialbuminuric advantage of cilnidipine compared with L-type calcium channel blockers in type 2 diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria and microalbuminuria.

Fukumoto Shinya, Ishimura Eiji, Motoyama Koka, Morioka Tomoaki, Kimoto Eiji, Wakikawa Ken, Shoji Shigeichi, Koyama Hidenori, Shoji Tetsuo, Emoto Masanori, Nishizawa Yoshiki, Inaba Masaaki, Cilnidipine vs L-type calcium channel blockers Evaluation of Antihypertensive Renoprotective Effects in Diabetic patients (CLEARED) Study Investigators

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We evaluated the antialbuminuric advantage of cilnidipine, an N/L-type calcium channel blocker (CCB), compared with L-type CCBs in diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria and microalbuminuria. The study was a multicenter, non-randomized crossover trial. Participants were 90 type 2 diabetic patients exhibiting either normo- or microalbuminuria, and undergoing CCB treatment for ≥6 months prior to study entry. The CCB at the time of entry was continued for the first 6 months (Period 1). Treatment was subsequently switched from cilnidipine to an L-type CCB, or vice versa, for the second 6-month observation period (Period 2). During Period 1, the L-type CCB group showed a significant increase of urinary albumin excretion (UAE) over time, while the cilnidipine group showed no significant elevation. During Period 2, switching of the treatment from the L-type CCB to cilnidipine resulted in significant reduction of the UAE, whereas switching from cilnidipine to the L-type CCB resulted in no significant change in the UAE. This study demonstrated that the antialbuminuric effect of Cilnidipine, but not the L-type CCBs, was sustained even in patients treated for a long time. In addition, the antialbuminuric effect can be anticipated after switching from an L-type CCB to cilnidipine, but not vice versa.

Для цитирования: Fukumoto Shinya, Ishimura Eiji, Motoyama Koka, Morioka Tomoaki, Kimoto Eiji, Wakikawa Ken, Shoji Shigeichi, Koyama Hidenori, Shoji Tetsuo, Emoto Masanori, Nishizawa Yoshiki, Inaba Masaaki, Cilnidipine vs L-type calcium channel blockers Evaluation of Antihypertensive Renoprotective Effects in Diabetic patients (CLEARED) Study Investigators. Antialbuminuric advantage of cilnidipine compared with L-type calcium channel blockers in type 2 diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria and microalbuminuria.. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.01.024.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.