Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
Comparison of contact force-guided procedure with non-contact force-guided procedure during left atrial mapping and pulmonary vein isolation: impact of contact force on recurrence of atrial fibrillation.
Сравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Makimoto Hisaki, Heeger Christian-H, Lin Tina, Rillig Andreas, Metzner Andreas, Wissner Erik, Mathew Shibu, Deiss Sebastian, Rausch Peter, Lemeš Christine, Kuck Karl-Heinz, Ouyang Feifan, Tilz Roland Richard
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of contact force (CF) visualization on the incidence of low and high CF during left atrial (LA) mapping and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).
METHODS: CF was assessed in 70 patients who underwent PVI. Three highly experienced operators performed all procedures. The operators were blinded to CF in group A (35 patients), and CF was displayed in group B (35 patients). In group B, optimal CF was defined as mean CF between 10 and 39g, and operators attempted to acquire points and ablate within this range.
RESULTS: A total of 8401 mapping points were analyzed during LA mapping (group A: 4104, group B: 4297). Low CF <10g and high CF ≥40g were noted in a significantly larger number of points in group A (37.7 vs. 12.0 %, P < 0.001; 11.5 vs. 1.5 %, P < 0.001). At the mitral isthmus and ridge areas, CF was significantly lower (7.7 vs. 12.2g, P < 0.001; 5.3 vs. 11.7g, P < 0.001) in group A than in group B. PVI was successfully achieved in all patients. There were significant site-dependent CF differences between the two groups. Optimal CF was achieved in significantly more applications in group B (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence rates after a minimum follow-up of 1 year between the two groups in this cohort (P = 0.24). No significant peri-procedural complications occurred in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: CF visualization can assist in avoiding both low and high CF, which may have the potential to improve lesion formation and patient safety profile. In this study, CF-guided ablation did not affect AF recurrence.
METHODS: CF was assessed in 70 patients who underwent PVI. Three highly experienced operators performed all procedures. The operators were blinded to CF in group A (35 patients), and CF was displayed in group B (35 patients). In group B, optimal CF was defined as mean CF between 10 and 39g, and operators attempted to acquire points and ablate within this range.
RESULTS: A total of 8401 mapping points were analyzed during LA mapping (group A: 4104, group B: 4297). Low CF <10g and high CF ≥40g were noted in a significantly larger number of points in group A (37.7 vs. 12.0 %, P < 0.001; 11.5 vs. 1.5 %, P < 0.001). At the mitral isthmus and ridge areas, CF was significantly lower (7.7 vs. 12.2g, P < 0.001; 5.3 vs. 11.7g, P < 0.001) in group A than in group B. PVI was successfully achieved in all patients. There were significant site-dependent CF differences between the two groups. Optimal CF was achieved in significantly more applications in group B (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence rates after a minimum follow-up of 1 year between the two groups in this cohort (P = 0.24). No significant peri-procedural complications occurred in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: CF visualization can assist in avoiding both low and high CF, which may have the potential to improve lesion formation and patient safety profile. In this study, CF-guided ablation did not affect AF recurrence.