Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology · 2010
Evaluation of sit-to-stand motion using a pressure distribution measurement system--effect of differences in seat hardness on sit-to-stand motion.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sato Shinsuke, Mizuma Masazumi, Kawate Nobuyuki, Kasai Fumihito, Watanabe Hideyasu
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study examined differences between standing from an ordinary seat and standing from a low-repulsion mat using a pressure distribution measurement system (BIG-MAT) and identified parameters to determine sit-to-stand (STS) motion difficulty.
METHOD: Ten healthy male volunteers (aged 30-38 years) participated. During STS motion from an ordinary seat and from a low-repulsion urethane mat, plantar surface pressure changes of both feet and the centre of pressure (COP) trajectory were recorded for 7 s. This series of tests was performed four times in each subject. Left and right pressure changes and COP changes were evaluated. Differences in the measurements between the low-repulsion mat and the ordinary seat were compared using the paired t-test.
RESULTS: COP changes were similar to those previously reported. Time from hindfoot peak to forefoot peak was significantly shorter with the ordinary chair than with the mat (p < 0.05). Percent change in forefoot pressure at forefoot peak and hindfoot peak (p < 0.01) and percent change in forefoot pressure at forefoot peak and stabilisation (p < 0.05) were significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: Time from hindfoot peak to forefoot peak and percent change in forefoot pressure at forefoot peak and hindfoot peak were the best indicators of STS motion difficulty.
METHOD: Ten healthy male volunteers (aged 30-38 years) participated. During STS motion from an ordinary seat and from a low-repulsion urethane mat, plantar surface pressure changes of both feet and the centre of pressure (COP) trajectory were recorded for 7 s. This series of tests was performed four times in each subject. Left and right pressure changes and COP changes were evaluated. Differences in the measurements between the low-repulsion mat and the ordinary seat were compared using the paired t-test.
RESULTS: COP changes were similar to those previously reported. Time from hindfoot peak to forefoot peak was significantly shorter with the ordinary chair than with the mat (p < 0.05). Percent change in forefoot pressure at forefoot peak and hindfoot peak (p < 0.01) and percent change in forefoot pressure at forefoot peak and stabilisation (p < 0.05) were significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: Time from hindfoot peak to forefoot peak and percent change in forefoot pressure at forefoot peak and hindfoot peak were the best indicators of STS motion difficulty.