Journal of nephrology · 2012
Olmesartan medoxomil and azelnidipine therapy in patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease in Japan.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Saito Ikuo, Kushiro Toshio, Zenimura Natsuko, Matsushita Yasuyuki, Sagawa Kei, Hiramatsu Katsutoshi, Yamaguchi Fumie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In the present investigation we extracted data on hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who were enrolled in 3 studies - 2 studies of the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan medoxomil (OLM), lasting 12 weeks and 2 years, respectively, and one of the calcium channel blocker (CCB) azelnidipine (AZ) lasting 12 weeks - to assess the effects of OLM and AZ on blood pressure (BP), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria in hypertensive patients with CKD in the setting of daily clinical practice.
METHODS: The 3 studies followed open prospective cohort designs that represented daily clinical practice in Japan. Patients with CKD at baseline were selected. Change of BP, eGFR and proteinuria on OLM therapy or AZ therapy were analyzed.
RESULTS: At 12 weeks, OLM (n=1,317) and AZ (n=952) therapies exhibited similar BP-lowering effects. AZ led to a significantly (p=0.0069) greater increase of eGFR compared with OLM, while OLM tended to improve proteinuria to a greater extent than AZ. Treatment with OLM for 2 years (n=109) significantly improved proteinuria but did not alter eGFR.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that OLM and AZ reduced BP and proteinuria without decreasing eGFR in Japanese hypertensive patients with CKD in the setting of daily clinical practice.
METHODS: The 3 studies followed open prospective cohort designs that represented daily clinical practice in Japan. Patients with CKD at baseline were selected. Change of BP, eGFR and proteinuria on OLM therapy or AZ therapy were analyzed.
RESULTS: At 12 weeks, OLM (n=1,317) and AZ (n=952) therapies exhibited similar BP-lowering effects. AZ led to a significantly (p=0.0069) greater increase of eGFR compared with OLM, while OLM tended to improve proteinuria to a greater extent than AZ. Treatment with OLM for 2 years (n=109) significantly improved proteinuria but did not alter eGFR.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that OLM and AZ reduced BP and proteinuria without decreasing eGFR in Japanese hypertensive patients with CKD in the setting of daily clinical practice.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsAsian PeopleAzetidinecarboxylic AcidBlood PressureCalcium Channel BlockersDihydropyridinesFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansHypertensionImidazolesJapanKidneyMaleMiddle AgedOlmesartan MedoxomilProspective StudiesProteinuriaRegistriesRenal Insufficiency, ChronicTetrazolesTime FactorsTreatment Outcome