Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi · 2012
National trends in anti-diabetic treatment in Taiwan, 2000-2009.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chang Chia-Hsuin, Jiang Yi-Der, Chung Ching-Hu, Ho Low-Tone, Chuang Lee-Ming
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The impact of the introduction of newer anti-diabetic agents on the treatment pattern in the booming diabetic population remains unclear. We examined the patterns and temporal trends of anti-diabetic drug use in Taiwan, with particular emphasis on combination therapy.
METHODS: We searched the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database during 2000-2009 to identify outpatient prescriptions of anti-diabetic drugs, including human insulins and insulin analogues, sulfonylureas, glinides, metformin, thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Glucose-lowering treatments were classified according to pattern (oral agents only, insulins only, and oral agents and insulins combined) and a number of different classes of anti-diabetic drugs. Insulin therapy and combination therapy with two oral anti-diabetic drugs (OAD) were further classified according to individual drug combination patterns.
RESULTS: Although metformin remained the mainstay of anti-diabetic treatment, patients receiving combination therapy of oral glucose-lowering agents, either with or without insulin, significantly increased, from approximately 40% in 2000 to 60% in 2009, particularly in relation to the newer agents, including glinides, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and long-acting insulin analogues. Use of sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones decreased substantially. For insulin therapy, the most commonly prescribed drugs were premix insulin analogues and basal insulin analogues, accounting for one-third of total insulin prescriptions in 2009.
CONCLUSION: We found an increasing complexity of anti-diabetic therapy during the past decade in Taiwan. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether this treatment pattern will lead to improved clinical outcomes in terms of cost-effectiveness.
METHODS: We searched the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database during 2000-2009 to identify outpatient prescriptions of anti-diabetic drugs, including human insulins and insulin analogues, sulfonylureas, glinides, metformin, thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Glucose-lowering treatments were classified according to pattern (oral agents only, insulins only, and oral agents and insulins combined) and a number of different classes of anti-diabetic drugs. Insulin therapy and combination therapy with two oral anti-diabetic drugs (OAD) were further classified according to individual drug combination patterns.
RESULTS: Although metformin remained the mainstay of anti-diabetic treatment, patients receiving combination therapy of oral glucose-lowering agents, either with or without insulin, significantly increased, from approximately 40% in 2000 to 60% in 2009, particularly in relation to the newer agents, including glinides, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and long-acting insulin analogues. Use of sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones decreased substantially. For insulin therapy, the most commonly prescribed drugs were premix insulin analogues and basal insulin analogues, accounting for one-third of total insulin prescriptions in 2009.
CONCLUSION: We found an increasing complexity of anti-diabetic therapy during the past decade in Taiwan. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether this treatment pattern will lead to improved clinical outcomes in terms of cost-effectiveness.