Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2012
The reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist (DFBC) for assessing the relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and their families with respect to adherence to treatment regimen.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hara Yoriko, Iwashita Sanae, Ishii Kouzabu, Inada Chizuko, Okada Akira, Tajiri Yuji, Nakayama Hitomi, Kato Tomoko, Nishida Keiko, Ogata Yasuhiro, Omori Hisamitsu, Morinaga Toru, Yamaguchi Midori, Nakao Motoyuki, Tsuboi Koji, Breugelmans Raoul, Ishihara Yoko
Аннотация
AIMS: An appropriate questionnaire for assessing family support of self-management behavior of Japanese Type 2 diabetes patients has yet to be developed. We produced a Japanese version of the Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist (DFBC) and tested its reliability and validity.
METHODS: The study enrolled Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus who were living with their families: 158 patients in the Insulin Group and 169 in the Oral Hypoglycemic Agents Group. The external validity of the DFBC was tested with questionnaires of self-managed dietary and exercise behaviors, the Appraisal of Diabetes Scale (ADS), and HbA1c.
RESULTS: The DFBC comprised two components: "Negative" and "Positive" feedbacks. Cronbach's alpha in the subcategories was ≥0.93, and the test-retest showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89. "Positive" and "Negative" scores correlated with self-managed dietary and/or exercise behaviors, the ADS scores in the both Groups. For patients having HbA1c levels of ≤6.8% there was a correlation between their "Positive" and "Negative" scores and the scores of their families in both Groups.
CONCLUSION: The DFBC showed evidence of validity and reliability and may be a useful tool for quick assessment of self-managed treatment behavior of Japanese Type 2 diabetes patients and support received from their family.
METHODS: The study enrolled Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus who were living with their families: 158 patients in the Insulin Group and 169 in the Oral Hypoglycemic Agents Group. The external validity of the DFBC was tested with questionnaires of self-managed dietary and exercise behaviors, the Appraisal of Diabetes Scale (ADS), and HbA1c.
RESULTS: The DFBC comprised two components: "Negative" and "Positive" feedbacks. Cronbach's alpha in the subcategories was ≥0.93, and the test-retest showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89. "Positive" and "Negative" scores correlated with self-managed dietary and/or exercise behaviors, the ADS scores in the both Groups. For patients having HbA1c levels of ≤6.8% there was a correlation between their "Positive" and "Negative" scores and the scores of their families in both Groups.
CONCLUSION: The DFBC showed evidence of validity and reliability and may be a useful tool for quick assessment of self-managed treatment behavior of Japanese Type 2 diabetes patients and support received from their family.