The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2021
A simplified strategy for donor-recipient size-matching in lung transplant for interstitial lung disease.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Riddell Peter, Ma Jin, Dunne Ben, Binnie Matthew, Cypel Marcello, Donahoe Laura, de Perrot Marc, Pierre Andrew, Waddell Tom K, Yeung Jonathan, Yasufuku Kazuhiro, Tomlinson George, Singer Lianne G, Keshavjee Shaf
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Donor-recipient size-matching has been repeatedly reported to improve outcomes following lung transplantation (LTx). However, there is significant variability in practice and the optimal strategy for size-matching is yet to be defined. For recipients with ILD, size-matching decisions are complicated by concerns regarding the potential impact of pre-LTx pulmonary restriction. We evaluate whether a specific donor-to-recipient size-matching strategy, based on predicted total lung capacity, benefits this patient group.
METHODS: This retrospective, single-centre, cohort study describes the post-LTx outcomes of adults who underwent LTx for ILD between 1983 and 2020. Only patients with restrictive physiology, based on pre-LTx pulmonary function testing were included. Post-LTx outcomes were compared based on donor-recipient predicted TLC (D-R pTLC) ratio. A D-R pTLC ratio of ≥0.8 or <1.2 for DLTx, and a D-R pTLC ratio of ≥0.8 or <1.0 for SLTx were classified as 'size-matched'.
RESULTS: Five-hundred and fifty LTx recipients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 404 underwent DLTx and 146 underwent SLTx. Size-matching was achieved in 78% of DLTx and 47% of SLTx. Overall survival (p = 0.007) and CLAD-free survival (p < 0.001) was significantly improved following a size-matched DLTx, compared to those with D-R pTLC ratios <0.8 or ≥1.2. Size-matching based on a D-R pTLC ratio 0.8≥ <1.0 for SLTX did not significantly improve survival.
CONCLUSIONS: D-R pTLC size-matching, based on a ratio of 0.8≥ <1.2 improved post-DLTx outcomes for patients with restrictive lung disease. This is simple to do, and if applied clinically, could improve overall outcomes in lung transplantation.
METHODS: This retrospective, single-centre, cohort study describes the post-LTx outcomes of adults who underwent LTx for ILD between 1983 and 2020. Only patients with restrictive physiology, based on pre-LTx pulmonary function testing were included. Post-LTx outcomes were compared based on donor-recipient predicted TLC (D-R pTLC) ratio. A D-R pTLC ratio of ≥0.8 or <1.2 for DLTx, and a D-R pTLC ratio of ≥0.8 or <1.0 for SLTx were classified as 'size-matched'.
RESULTS: Five-hundred and fifty LTx recipients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 404 underwent DLTx and 146 underwent SLTx. Size-matching was achieved in 78% of DLTx and 47% of SLTx. Overall survival (p = 0.007) and CLAD-free survival (p < 0.001) was significantly improved following a size-matched DLTx, compared to those with D-R pTLC ratios <0.8 or ≥1.2. Size-matching based on a D-R pTLC ratio 0.8≥ <1.0 for SLTX did not significantly improve survival.
CONCLUSIONS: D-R pTLC size-matching, based on a ratio of 0.8≥ <1.2 improved post-DLTx outcomes for patients with restrictive lung disease. This is simple to do, and if applied clinically, could improve overall outcomes in lung transplantation.