Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases · 2014
Need for improvements in the surveillance and management of chronic viral hepatitis in HIV patients followed in a Danish outpatient clinic.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Andersen Karen Lise Dahl, Larsen Carsten Schade, Petersen Mikkel Steen, Leutscher Peter Derek Christian
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) surveillance and management in HIV patients currently followed in an outpatient clinic at a Danish University Hospital.
METHODS: Patient data, including demographic characteristics, clinical findings, and hepatitis serology, were reviewed at baseline. Patients with incomplete or non-updated serology within the last 2 y were retested in the next 6 months, and the results were reviewed again at follow-up.
RESULTS: At baseline, 84% and 74% of the 574 HIV patients were found to have incomplete and/or non-updated HBV and HCV serology, respectively. At follow-up, updated HBV serology was achieved in 535 (93%) patients; 15 (3%) patients were found to have a chronic active infection and 156 (27%) had a resolved infection, whereas 65 (11%) were vaccinated against HBV and 299 (52%) were non-immune. No patients were found to have developed chronic HBV infection following HIV diagnosis (equal to 3649 patient-y). Updated HCV serology revealed that 25 (4%) had a chronic active HCV infection and 15 (3%) had a resolved HCV infection. The anti-HCV incidence rate was 0.27/100 patient-y. A liver pathology assessment had not been performed within the last 2 y in 80% of the HBV and 32% of the HCV co-infected patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis screening and assessment had been inadequately performed. New cases of chronic hepatitis seem to occur infrequently. However, a more proactive hepatitis surveillance and management strategy integrated into the overall HIV health care program is warranted.
METHODS: Patient data, including demographic characteristics, clinical findings, and hepatitis serology, were reviewed at baseline. Patients with incomplete or non-updated serology within the last 2 y were retested in the next 6 months, and the results were reviewed again at follow-up.
RESULTS: At baseline, 84% and 74% of the 574 HIV patients were found to have incomplete and/or non-updated HBV and HCV serology, respectively. At follow-up, updated HBV serology was achieved in 535 (93%) patients; 15 (3%) patients were found to have a chronic active infection and 156 (27%) had a resolved infection, whereas 65 (11%) were vaccinated against HBV and 299 (52%) were non-immune. No patients were found to have developed chronic HBV infection following HIV diagnosis (equal to 3649 patient-y). Updated HCV serology revealed that 25 (4%) had a chronic active HCV infection and 15 (3%) had a resolved HCV infection. The anti-HCV incidence rate was 0.27/100 patient-y. A liver pathology assessment had not been performed within the last 2 y in 80% of the HBV and 32% of the HCV co-infected patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis screening and assessment had been inadequately performed. New cases of chronic hepatitis seem to occur infrequently. However, a more proactive hepatitis surveillance and management strategy integrated into the overall HIV health care program is warranted.