Annals of surgery · 2023
Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization With Mucopexy Versus Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy for Prolapsed Internal Hemorrhoids: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gachabayov Mahir, Angelos George, Orangio Guy, Abcarian Herand, Bergamaschi Roberto, Hemorrhoids Study Group
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) with mucopexy to Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in terms of recurrence rates and quality of life.
BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty regarding the durability of the therapeutic effect of THD with mucopexy compared with Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in terms of recurrence rates.
METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective study. Participating surgeons performed the operation they knew best enrolling 10 patients each. Surgeons' unedited videos were reviewed by an independent expert. Patients with prolapsed internal hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns were eligible. The primary endpoint was recurrence rates defined as prolapsing internal hemorrhoids. Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction were evaluated with Pain Scale and Brief Pain Inventory, Fecal Incontinence Quality Of Life (FIQOL), Cleveland Clinic Incontinence, Constipation, Short-Form 12 scores, and Patient satisfaction (4-point Likert) scale.
RESULTS: Twenty surgeons enrolled 197 patients. THD patients had lower Visual pain scores at postoperative day (POD) 1 (6.2 vs 8.3, P =0.047), POD7 (4.5 vs 7.7, P =0.021), POD14 (2.8 vs 5.3, P <0.001), and medication use at POD14 (23% vs 58%, P <0.001). Median follow-up was 3.1 (1.0-5.5) years. Recurrence rates did not differ between the study arms (5.9% vs 2.4%, P =0.253). Patient satisfaction rate was higher after THD at POD14 (76.4% vs 52.5%, P =0.031) and 3 months (95.1% vs 63.3%, P =0.029), but did not differ at 6 months (91.7% vs 88%, P =0.228) and 1 year (94.2% vs 88%, P =0.836).
CONCLUSION: THD with mucopexy was associated with improved patient-reported outcomes and quality of life as compared with Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy with nonsignificantly different recurrence rates.
BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty regarding the durability of the therapeutic effect of THD with mucopexy compared with Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in terms of recurrence rates.
METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective study. Participating surgeons performed the operation they knew best enrolling 10 patients each. Surgeons' unedited videos were reviewed by an independent expert. Patients with prolapsed internal hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns were eligible. The primary endpoint was recurrence rates defined as prolapsing internal hemorrhoids. Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction were evaluated with Pain Scale and Brief Pain Inventory, Fecal Incontinence Quality Of Life (FIQOL), Cleveland Clinic Incontinence, Constipation, Short-Form 12 scores, and Patient satisfaction (4-point Likert) scale.
RESULTS: Twenty surgeons enrolled 197 patients. THD patients had lower Visual pain scores at postoperative day (POD) 1 (6.2 vs 8.3, P =0.047), POD7 (4.5 vs 7.7, P =0.021), POD14 (2.8 vs 5.3, P <0.001), and medication use at POD14 (23% vs 58%, P <0.001). Median follow-up was 3.1 (1.0-5.5) years. Recurrence rates did not differ between the study arms (5.9% vs 2.4%, P =0.253). Patient satisfaction rate was higher after THD at POD14 (76.4% vs 52.5%, P =0.031) and 3 months (95.1% vs 63.3%, P =0.029), but did not differ at 6 months (91.7% vs 88%, P =0.228) and 1 year (94.2% vs 88%, P =0.836).
CONCLUSION: THD with mucopexy was associated with improved patient-reported outcomes and quality of life as compared with Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy with nonsignificantly different recurrence rates.