Virology · 2025
Evaluation of commercial vaccines for efficacy and transmission control against the emergent H5N8 (clade 2.3.4.4b) avian influenza virus in Kazakhstan.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tabynov Kairat, Kuanyshbek Aidana, Zharmambet Kuantay, Yelchibayeva Leila, Karibayev Talgat, Berdikulov Maxat, Zhumadilova Zauresh, Tabynov Kaissar
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 (clade 2.3.4.4b) has caused devastating poultry outbreaks globally, including in Kazakhstan, underscoring the need for vaccines that protect birds and curb virus transmission. We evaluated the efficacy of three commercial H5 vaccines and an experimental homologous H5N8 vaccine in chickens.
METHODS: Chickens received a single dose of each of the four vaccines (three commercial and one experimental), and antibody titers were measured over 4 weeks. At 30 days post-vaccination, birds were challenged intranasally with a virulent H5N8 strain and monitored for 10 days for survival and clinical signs. Virus titers in tracheal and cloacal swabs (days 1, 3, 5 post-challenge) measured shedding, and unvaccinated sentinel chickens were co-housed to assess transmission.
RESULTS: The homologous H5N8 vaccine and a closely related commercial vaccine elicited rapid, high antibody responses and conferred 100 % survival. In contrast, two vaccines with lower antigenic similarity to the challenge strain induced slower, lower immunity, resulting in 40-60 % mortality and higher virus shedding. Only the homologous vaccine markedly reduced viral shedding and limited transmission to contact birds (protecting 2 of 3 sentinel birds), whereas the other vaccines failed to prevent transmission.
CONCLUSION: An antigenically matched H5N8 vaccine with a potent adjuvant provided near-sterilizing immunity, preventing disease and significantly limiting viral shedding and transmission. These findings highlight the importance of using strain-matched vaccines in HPAI control strategies to avoid silent viral spread in vaccinated flocks.
METHODS: Chickens received a single dose of each of the four vaccines (three commercial and one experimental), and antibody titers were measured over 4 weeks. At 30 days post-vaccination, birds were challenged intranasally with a virulent H5N8 strain and monitored for 10 days for survival and clinical signs. Virus titers in tracheal and cloacal swabs (days 1, 3, 5 post-challenge) measured shedding, and unvaccinated sentinel chickens were co-housed to assess transmission.
RESULTS: The homologous H5N8 vaccine and a closely related commercial vaccine elicited rapid, high antibody responses and conferred 100 % survival. In contrast, two vaccines with lower antigenic similarity to the challenge strain induced slower, lower immunity, resulting in 40-60 % mortality and higher virus shedding. Only the homologous vaccine markedly reduced viral shedding and limited transmission to contact birds (protecting 2 of 3 sentinel birds), whereas the other vaccines failed to prevent transmission.
CONCLUSION: An antigenically matched H5N8 vaccine with a potent adjuvant provided near-sterilizing immunity, preventing disease and significantly limiting viral shedding and transmission. These findings highlight the importance of using strain-matched vaccines in HPAI control strategies to avoid silent viral spread in vaccinated flocks.