MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/tmi.13382

Медицинская библиотека · Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2020

Commercially approved vaccines for canine leishmaniosis: a review of available data on their safety and efficacy.

Velez Rita, Gállego Montserrat

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Canine leishmaniosis is an important vector-borne zoonosis caused mainly by Leishmania infantum. Diagnosis and treatment of affected individuals can be particularly complex, hindering infection control in endemic areas. Methods to prevent canine leishmaniosis include the use of topical insecticides, prophylactic immunotherapy and vaccination. Four vaccines against canine leishmaniosis have been licensed since 2004, two in Brazil (Leishmune®, the production and marketing licence of which was withdrawn in 2014, and Leish-Tec®) and two in Europe (CaniLeish® and LetiFend®). After several years of marketing, doubts remain regarding vaccine efficacy and effectiveness, potential infectiousness of vaccinated and infected animals or the interference of vaccine-induced antibodies in L. infantum serological diagnosis. This review summarises the scientific evidence for each of the vaccines commercially approved for canine leishmaniosis, while discussing possible weaknesses of these studies. Furthermore, it raises the need to address important questions related to vaccination impact in Leishmania-endemic countries and the importance of post-marketing pharmacological surveillance.

Для цитирования: Velez Rita, Gállego Montserrat. Commercially approved vaccines for canine leishmaniosis: a review of available data on their safety and efficacy.. Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH. 2020. DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13382.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.