Cureus · 2026
Checkpoint Inhibitor-Treated Merkel Cell Carcinoma With Cytokeratin 20 (CK20)-Negative Metastatic Immunophenotypic Divergence: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Berlingeri Collazo Diego, Cintron Perez Lester, Torres Troche Emmanuel, Vora Sanjay
Аннотация
An octogenarian woman with Merkel cell carcinoma of the right upper arm, staged as Stage IIIA at initial diagnosis, underwent wide local excision with sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by adjuvant radiation therapy. She later developed regional nodal recurrence requiring axillary dissection, which was confirmed by biopsy as metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma, requiring axillary dissection. Despite subsequent treatment with pembrolizumab, she developed progressive metastatic disease one year later, with new hepatic and pulmonary lesions. Biopsy of a hepatic lesion demonstrated a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma with a high proliferative index. Notably, immunohistochemistry showed absence of cytokeratin 20 (CK20) expression, raising diagnostic uncertainty regarding lineage confirmation in the setting of CK20-negative metastatic disease. Given the clinical context, the patient was treated with carboplatin and etoposide per established guidelines for high-grade neuroendocrine tumors; however, she exhibited continued disease progression and ultimately transitioned to hospice care, where she died. This case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of advanced Merkel cell carcinoma in the setting of immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure, particularly the potential for loss of the canonical Merkel cell carcinoma immunophenotype at metastatic sites following such therapy. It underscores the importance of integrating clinical history, treatment exposure, and morphologic findings when evaluating atypical metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, especially when canonical immunohistochemical markers such as CK20 are absent.