MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3233/wor-2010-1068

Медицинская библиотека · Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2010

Improved injury management at an Australian aluminium smelter.

Viljoen Deon, Guest Maya, Boggess May, Duked Janine

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This longitudinal study sought to determine the effectiveness of interventions to improve injury management in an industrial setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Study participants were workers from three production departments of a large aluminium smelter.

METHODS

The interventions introduced were to encourage active participation in rehabilitation procedures by injured workers, improve communication with all stakeholders, identify and manage psychosocial issues, and focus the workforce on occupational health and safety matters. Linear regression modelling was used to determine the effectiveness of the interventions using data collected for fourteen months before and fifteen months after the introduction of interventions. Outcomes compared were the number of injuries, number of persons on restricted duty, and lost hours per month.

RESULTS

Modelling showed the intervention significantly reduced the number of injuries in the potrooms (from 14 to 6 per month). The number of persons on restricted duties was reduced in all departments (potrooms: from 12 to 7 persons per month, cast house: 3 to 1 person per month, carbon plant: 3 to 1 person per month). Lost hours were significantly reduced in the potrooms (from 244 to 61 hours per month).

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the revised injury management process introduced.

Для цитирования: Viljoen Deon, Guest Maya, Boggess May, Duked Janine. Improved injury management at an Australian aluminium smelter.. Work (Reading, Mass.). 2010. DOI: 10.3233/wor-2010-1068.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.