MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Revista de enfermeria (Barcelona, Spain) · 2010

[Implementation of safety devices: biological accident prevention].

Catalán Gómez M Teresa, Sol Vidiella Josep, Castellà Castellà Manel, Castells Bo Carolina, Losada Pla Nuria, Espuny Javier Lluís

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Accidental exposures to blood and biological material were the most frequent and potentially serious accidents in healthcare workers, reported in the Prevention of Occupational Risks Unit within 2002.

BACKGROUND

Evaluate the biological percutaneous accidents decrease after a progressive introduction of safety devices. Biological accidents produced between 2.002 and 2.006 were analyzed and reported by the injured healthcare workers to the Level 2b Hospital Prevention of Occupational Risk Unit with 238 beds and 750 employees. The key of the study was the safety devices (peripheral i.v. catheter, needleless i.v. access device and capillary blood collection lancet). Within 2002, 54 percutaneous biological accidents were registered and 19 in 2006, that represents a 64.8% decreased. There has been no safety devices accident reported involving these material. Accidents registered during the implantation period occurred because safety devices were not used at that time. Safety devices have proven to be effective in reducing needle stick percutaneous accidents, so that they are a good choice in the primary prevention of biological accidents contact.

Для цитирования: Catalán Gómez M Teresa, Sol Vidiella Josep, Castellà Castellà Manel, Castells Bo Carolina, Losada Pla Nuria, Espuny Javier Lluís. [Implementation of safety devices: biological accident prevention].. Revista de enfermeria (Barcelona, Spain). 2010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.