MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2008

Occupational rehabilitation services provided by a community workers health centre in Hong Kong: a case study.

Chan Elaine Y L, Woo Karen W S, Tang Tina M Y

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In Hong Kong, the Employees' Compensation Ordinance (ECO), based on the model of the English Workmen's Compensation Act 1943, establishes a no-fault, non-contributory system for work injuries. It focuses merely on the minimum social expectation in compensating injured workers in monetary terms, but does not place much emphasis on prevention, rehabilitation and return to work policies for workers with injury. There is a need to reform an effective and comprehensive occupational rehabilitation system for workers with work injury in Hong Kong.

METHODS

This paper presents a case study of a worker with work injury undergoing occupational rehabilitation through services provided in the local community setting by the Hong Kong Workers' Health Centre.

RESULTS

The case study highlights some crucial factors and/or intervention modalities in facilitating workers' return to work, including timely intervention, work-site based rehabilitation, communication among different stakeholders, dynamics of company, rehabilitation counselling, community integration and individualized work resettlement.

CONCLUSION

Without reviewing and revamping the current ECO, the goal to provide timely and effective occupational rehabilitation services for workers with injury could not be fully achieved.

Для цитирования: Chan Elaine Y L, Woo Karen W S, Tang Tina M Y. Occupational rehabilitation services provided by a community workers health centre in Hong Kong: a case study.. Work (Reading, Mass.). 2008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.