Disability and rehabilitation · 2008
Prediction of hand function after occupational hand injury by evaluation of initial anatomical severity.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Chia-Ling, Wu Ming-Yi, Chang Jer-Hao, Chiu Haw-Yen, Chiang Ching-Hsiang, Huang Mao-Hsiung, Guo Yue-Liang
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between initial anatomic severity evaluated by the Hand Injury Severity Scoring (HISS) system and recovered hand function evaluated by the Purdue Pegboard after occupational hand injury.
METHOD: In the retrospective cohort study, 95 patients hospitalized between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2003 for surgery due to occupational hand injury were recruited. The HISS scores were obtained by chart review by a surgeon. The Purdue Pegboard was performed at least 6 months after the injury by well-trained occupational therapists. The Purdue Pegboard scores were compared with the initial HISS scores by simple regression, multiple regression and logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: The total HISS score was negatively correlated with scores of the Purdue Pegboard subtests, including injured-hand, both-hands, and assembly. The risk of having low injured-hand score (<13) was significantly increased in workers with initial major severity (HISS >or= 101), with OR 9.57 (95% CI 1.4-94.8). The risk of having low both-hands score (<10) was significantly increased in workers with initial severe and major severity (HISS of 51-100 and >or=101), with OR 4.5 (95% CI 1.1-21.8) and OR 25 (95% CI 3.5-263). The risk of having low assembly score (<25) was significantly increased in workers with initial major severity (HISS >or= 101), with OR 9.0 (95% CI 1.3-72.5).
CONCLUSION: The study showed that after occupational hand injury, initial anatomic severity evaluated by the HISS system could predict hand function after recovery.
METHOD: In the retrospective cohort study, 95 patients hospitalized between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2003 for surgery due to occupational hand injury were recruited. The HISS scores were obtained by chart review by a surgeon. The Purdue Pegboard was performed at least 6 months after the injury by well-trained occupational therapists. The Purdue Pegboard scores were compared with the initial HISS scores by simple regression, multiple regression and logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: The total HISS score was negatively correlated with scores of the Purdue Pegboard subtests, including injured-hand, both-hands, and assembly. The risk of having low injured-hand score (<13) was significantly increased in workers with initial major severity (HISS >or= 101), with OR 9.57 (95% CI 1.4-94.8). The risk of having low both-hands score (<10) was significantly increased in workers with initial severe and major severity (HISS of 51-100 and >or=101), with OR 4.5 (95% CI 1.1-21.8) and OR 25 (95% CI 3.5-263). The risk of having low assembly score (<25) was significantly increased in workers with initial major severity (HISS >or= 101), with OR 9.0 (95% CI 1.3-72.5).
CONCLUSION: The study showed that after occupational hand injury, initial anatomic severity evaluated by the HISS system could predict hand function after recovery.