MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2004

Choosing a model of care for patients in alternate level care: caregiver perspectives with respect to staff injury.

Ostry Aleck S, Tomlin Katrina M, Cvitkovich Yuri, Ratner Pamela A, Park Il Hyeok, Tate Robert B, Yassi Annalee

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The population of alternate level care (ALC) patients utilizing acute-care hospital resources inappropriate to their needs is growing. The purpose of this study was to explore how the care of ALC patients was managed at 4 acute-care facilities in the Canadian province of British Columbia and to examine how this care impacts on outcomes of staff injury. Interviews were conducted to identify and characterize the different models of ALC. Injury outcomes for all caregivers were obtained (n = 2,854) and logistic regression conducted to compare staff injuries across ALC models. Injured workers were surveyed regarding their perceptions of injury risk and ALC. Five ALC models were identified: low-mix, high-mix, dedicated ALC units, extended care units, and geriatric assessment units. The risk for caregiver injuries was lowest on dedicated ALC units. These findings suggest that acute-care facilities faced with a growing ALC population should consider creating dedicated ALC units.

Для цитирования: Ostry Aleck S, Tomlin Katrina M, Cvitkovich Yuri, Ratner Pamela A, Park Il Hyeok, Tate Robert B, Yassi Annalee. Choosing a model of care for patients in alternate level care: caregiver perspectives with respect to staff injury.. The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres. 2004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.