MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/occmed/kqg030

Медицинская библиотека · Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2003

Neurological effects of radiofrequency radiation.

Hocking Bruce, Westerman R

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The health effects of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) and the adequacy of the safety standards are a subject of debate. One source of human data is case reports regarding peripheral neurological effects of RFR, mainly noxious sensations or dysaesthesiae.

AIM: To investigate health effects, neurophysiological mechanisms and safety levels for RFR.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search for case reports and case series associated with mobile phone technology as well as other RFR sources using specific search terms on PubMed.

RESULTS

We identified 11 original articles detailing case reports or case series and matching the search criteria. Five of the identified papers were written by at least one of the authors (B.H. or R.W.).

CONCLUSIONS

Cases have arisen after exposure to much of the radiofrequency range. In some cases, symptoms are transitory but lasting in others. After very high exposures, nerves may be grossly injured. After lower exposures, which may result in dysaesthesia, ordinary nerve conduction studies find no abnormality but current perception threshold studies have found abnormalities. Only a small proportion of similarly exposed people develop symptoms. The role of modulations needs clarification. Some of these observations are not consistent with the prevailing hypothesis that all health effects of RFR arise from thermal mechanisms.

Для цитирования: Hocking Bruce, Westerman R. Neurological effects of radiofrequency radiation.. Occupational medicine (Oxford, England). 2003. DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqg030.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.