Disability and rehabilitation · 2002
Self-responsibility and coping with pain: disparate attitudes toward psychosocial issues in recovery from work place injury.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Antoniazzi M, Celinski M, Alcock J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare injured worker and health professional ratings of psychosocial variables as they relate to recovery.
METHOD: Seventy patients and 70 health care staff at an injured worker rehabilitation centre completed a 17-item checklist. Each subject selected five psychosocial variables believed to be most important to recovery. Group ratings were compared using chi-square with a Bonferroni adjustment.
RESULTS: In general, patients and health professionals agreed on the relative importance of 15 of 17 variables. However, the groups did differ significantly on two items--staff rated 'self-responsibility' higher than patients, while patients rated 'coping with pain' higher than staff.
CONCLUSIONS: The ratings reflect the occasionally divergent goals and expectations of the rehabilitation staff and patient groups. Consequently, some patients may be moved into inappropriate treatment modalities, resulting in non-compliance. Being aware of patient beliefs and expectations should assist health care professionals in generating improved rehabilitation outcomes by promoting better co-operation through shared perceptions and goals.
METHOD: Seventy patients and 70 health care staff at an injured worker rehabilitation centre completed a 17-item checklist. Each subject selected five psychosocial variables believed to be most important to recovery. Group ratings were compared using chi-square with a Bonferroni adjustment.
RESULTS: In general, patients and health professionals agreed on the relative importance of 15 of 17 variables. However, the groups did differ significantly on two items--staff rated 'self-responsibility' higher than patients, while patients rated 'coping with pain' higher than staff.
CONCLUSIONS: The ratings reflect the occasionally divergent goals and expectations of the rehabilitation staff and patient groups. Consequently, some patients may be moved into inappropriate treatment modalities, resulting in non-compliance. Being aware of patient beliefs and expectations should assist health care professionals in generating improved rehabilitation outcomes by promoting better co-operation through shared perceptions and goals.