The Clinical journal of pain · 1998
Perceived efficacy of pain clinics in the rehabilitation of injured workers.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Robinson J P, Allen T, Fulton L D, Martin D C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the perceived efficacy of pain clinics in the rehabilitation of injured workers among four groups of professionals.
DESIGN: A questionnaire was given to 351 subjects representing four professional groups: physicians, vocational rehabilitation counselors, staff at pain clinics, and employees of a workers compensation program. Subjects rated the effectiveness of pain clinics in eight specific functions, estimated the percentage of workers who return to work after pain clinic treatment, and indicated how soon after injury a worker should be referred to a pain clinic.
RESULTS: Pain clinic staff consistently gave the most favorable ratings and workers compensation employees the least favorable ones. There was good agreement across professional groups regarding the need for early referral of injured workers to pain clinics and the specific functions that pain clinics carry out relatively well. Clinics were ranked as most effective in reducing workers' use of opiates, and as least effective in reducing workers' pain. Return-to-work estimates varied significantly across professional groups. Within professional groups, subjects with high estimates gave more favorable overall ratings to pain clinics.
CONCLUSIONS: The results provide a profile of the perceived effectiveness of pain clinics in various functions and highlight the importance of getting accurate information about return to work rates following pain clinic treatment. They suggest that workers are not referred to pain clinics early enough.
DESIGN: A questionnaire was given to 351 subjects representing four professional groups: physicians, vocational rehabilitation counselors, staff at pain clinics, and employees of a workers compensation program. Subjects rated the effectiveness of pain clinics in eight specific functions, estimated the percentage of workers who return to work after pain clinic treatment, and indicated how soon after injury a worker should be referred to a pain clinic.
RESULTS: Pain clinic staff consistently gave the most favorable ratings and workers compensation employees the least favorable ones. There was good agreement across professional groups regarding the need for early referral of injured workers to pain clinics and the specific functions that pain clinics carry out relatively well. Clinics were ranked as most effective in reducing workers' use of opiates, and as least effective in reducing workers' pain. Return-to-work estimates varied significantly across professional groups. Within professional groups, subjects with high estimates gave more favorable overall ratings to pain clinics.
CONCLUSIONS: The results provide a profile of the perceived effectiveness of pain clinics in various functions and highlight the importance of getting accurate information about return to work rates following pain clinic treatment. They suggest that workers are not referred to pain clinics early enough.