Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
Artificial intelligence-based assessment of tumor bed stroma in non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: Association with pathologic response and survival. A multicenter study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pezzuto Federica, Vedovelli Luca, Maggioni Giuseppe, Fortarezza Francesco, Ascione Andrea, Pernazza Angelina, Marinelli Daniele, Brascia Debora, Piscuoglio Salvatore, Lombardi Mariano, Spaggiari Lorenzo, Galetta Domenico, Pasello Giulia, Schiavon Marco, Anile Marco, Dell'Amore Andrea, Gregori Dario, Graziano Paolo, Visca Paolo, Bossi Paola, Marulli Giuseppe, Rocco Elena Guerini, d'Amati Giulia, Calabrese Fiorella
Аннотация
Histopathologic assessment of the tumor bed following neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasingly relevant, but comparative data across treatment modalities remain limited. We evaluated tumor bed features and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted stromal quantification in advanced NSCLC, comparing patients treated with immunotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and chemotherapy. This multicenter retrospective study included 71 patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC who underwent salvage surgery after neoadjuvant therapy at five Italian centers between 2018 and 2022. Thirty-eight patients received immune-based therapy, 16 received TKIs, and 17 received chemotherapy alone. Tumor bed response was assessed according to International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer recommendations, including residual viable tumor, necrosis, fibrosis, and inflammation. Immune-related features were recorded. AI-assisted morphometric analysis quantified fibrosis on Azan-Mallory staining and inflammatory burden on CD45 immunohistochemistry. The immunotherapy group showed the most favorable regression profile, with higher pathological complete response rates than the TKI and chemotherapy groups, respectively (40.5% vs 21.4% vs 11.8%), and lower residual viable tumor burden (median, 5% vs 45% vs 45%). This group also showed a more immune-reactive tumor bed phenotype and significantly higher AI-quantified inflammatory burden (p = 0.022). In the overall cohort, multivariable analysis identified residual viable tumor percentage (HR, 1.02; p = 0.018) and AI-derived fibrosis (HR, 0.97; p = 0.013) as independent predictors of recurrence. Tumor bed evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy provides prognostically relevant information beyond residual viable tumor alone. AI-assisted fibrosis quantification may complement viable tumor assessment and refine post-surgical risk stratification.