MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf01203300

Медицинская библиотека · Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 1995

'When is VISION asked too much'?

van der Wildt G J, den Brinker B P, Wertheim A H

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The last two decades a shift took place from substitutional/compensatory training to utilisation of residual vision regarding rehabilitation of the visually impaired. Some of the visually impaired are able to use their visual perception nearly as complete as normal seeing people in spite of a severe visual disability. On the other hand, people with nearly normal functions can be severely visually handicapped. To illustrate this, two cases are presented. The first case is a man, aged 47 years, with a juvenile macular degeneration on both eyes. In spite of a very low visual acuity of less then 0.05, he finished an university education and he is able to maintain himself very well in a leading position in a scientific environment, by using adequate low vision devices. Also for his leisure activities, as photography and speed skating, he relies upon visual perception. The second case is a woman, aged 30 years, with nearly normal visual functions, who is not able to read for longer periods caused by conflicting information from the body- and eye movements, and the visual input. This causes sickness during reading. She is unable to use books for her study and is working with recordings on tape. The results of a comprehensive visual assessment will be related to the specific low vision devices and its use.

Для цитирования: van der Wildt G J, den Brinker B P, Wertheim A H. 'When is VISION asked too much'?. Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology. 1995. DOI: 10.1007/bf01203300.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.