Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2022
Therapist's interventions immediately after exceeding the client's therapeutic zone of proximal development: A comparative case study.
Клинический случайСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cardoso Cátia, Ferreira Ângela, Pinto Dulce, Ribeiro Eugénia
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: When therapists' proposals are too demanding exceeding clients' readiness to move into change, clients may resist advancing. We aimed to understand how a therapist behaved immediately after the client resisted advancing into change within Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy.
METHODS: We analyzed a recovered and an unrecovered case, both with Major Depression, and followed by the same therapist. Through the Therapeutic Collaboration Coding System, we analyzed 407 exchanges of interest.
RESULTS: In both cases, clients resisted more in advancing at intermediate sessions, mainly by the therapist's challenges to raise insight and debate cognitive beliefs in the recovered case, and to seek experiential meanings in the unrecovered case. Immediately after clients resisted advancing, the therapist tended to insist on challenging them in the same direction. In the recovered case, the therapist did so continually throughout the therapy, sometimes balancing between insisting or stepping back. In the unrecovered case, the therapist insisted on challenging, but mostly at the final session. Occasionally, the therapist insisted on challenging, and clients resisted over consecutive exchanges.
CONCLUSION: Our results reinforce that to enact progress and change clients need to be pushed into change, however it requires therapists' skillful assessment of clients' tolerance to move in time.
METHODS: We analyzed a recovered and an unrecovered case, both with Major Depression, and followed by the same therapist. Through the Therapeutic Collaboration Coding System, we analyzed 407 exchanges of interest.
RESULTS: In both cases, clients resisted more in advancing at intermediate sessions, mainly by the therapist's challenges to raise insight and debate cognitive beliefs in the recovered case, and to seek experiential meanings in the unrecovered case. Immediately after clients resisted advancing, the therapist tended to insist on challenging them in the same direction. In the recovered case, the therapist did so continually throughout the therapy, sometimes balancing between insisting or stepping back. In the unrecovered case, the therapist insisted on challenging, but mostly at the final session. Occasionally, the therapist insisted on challenging, and clients resisted over consecutive exchanges.
CONCLUSION: Our results reinforce that to enact progress and change clients need to be pushed into change, however it requires therapists' skillful assessment of clients' tolerance to move in time.