Introduction
With continuous advances in medical technology, the survival rates of cancer patients have improved significantly, and the global number of cancer survivors continues to grow ( 1 , 2 ). The U.S. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) defines a cancer survivor as an individual from the moment of diagnosis until the end of life ( 2 ). However, increased survival rates have also brought new challenges. The diagnosis of cancer and its subsequent treatment not only cause physical suffering to the patients, but may also induce or exacerbate mental health problems, and may even lead to suicidal thoughts ( 3 ). The resulting psychological distress is not merely a temporary emotional fluctuation, but is often persistent and can severely impair patients’ quality of life and overall well-being.
Among these, anxiety and depression are particularly common and prominent problems. A meta-analysis ( 4 ) has shown that the combined prevalence of anxiety and depression among cancer patients worldwide remains high, with the prevalence of depression in breast cancer patients reaching as high as 68% ( 5 ). Existing research ( 6 ) has confirmed that psychological distress is significantly negatively correlated with all dimensions of quality of life and remains prevalent for up to 25 years after diagnosis ( 7 ). It has gradually become a public health issue that urgently requires attention and intervention. Given its profound impact on patient prognosis, symptom management has been established as a core component of cancer care by authoritative international guidelines. In 2023, the Society for Integrative Oncology (SIO) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) jointly published the Integrative Oncology Care of Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in Adults With Cancer . NCCN and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) have also emphasized the need for systematic screening and intervention for such psychosocial issues. This study selected anxiety and depression as core outcome measures not only because they are commonly reported psychological burdens among cancer survivors but also because they have well-established quantification standards, facilitating the pooling and comparison of standardized mean differences (SMD) across different art interventions. Furthermore, considering the interaction between psychological and physiological functions, this study concurrently included key outcome measures, such as pain, fatigue, and quality of life, to provide a multidimensional assessment of the effectiveness of art therapy for cancer survivors.
In the field of psychological intervention, art therapy has garnered significant attention in recent years. First proposed by Adrian Hill in the 1940s ( 8 ), this therapy uses artistic media to facilitate emotional expression and psychological healing and assists patients in coping with somatic symptoms and complex emotions ( 9 ). Current evidence ( 10 , 11 ) indicates that art therapy plays a positive role in improving the mental health of cancer patients and alleviating the burden of symptoms. Art therapy encompasses a diverse range of modalities ( 11 ), including music, dance/movement, visual arts, and narrative creation. To explain the psychological mechanisms underlying different art forms, the Expressive Therapies Continuum (ETC) ( 12 ) posits that various art forms can facilitate emotional regulation and psychological integration by activating different levels of psychological processing, ranging from kinesthetic perception to cognitive symbols. Specifically, music therapy engages basic sensory perception through the auditory pathway, facilitates emotional regulation, and alleviates physical symptoms. It is currently one of the intervention forms with the most robust evidence base ( 13 , 14 ). Some culturally specific musical forms, such as Sufi music centered on the Ney flute, have been shown to significantly improve mental health outcomes in cancer patients due to their meditative and calming qualities ( 15 ). Similarly, dance/movement therapy promotes emotional release through physical movement and rhythmic experience ( 16 , 17 ). Visual arts therapy primarily works at the affective-perceptual level; for instance, mandala painting externalizes implicit emotions into structured images to alleviate anxiety ( 18 ). Self-book therapy focuses on cognitive integration and guides patients to symbolically integrate fragmented emotions to enhance psychological resilience and self-identity ( 19 , 20 ).
Although art therapy has demonstrated some positive effects, the existing evidence remains limited. Reports on efficacy vary across studies ( 21 – 23 ). More critically, the vast majority of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared only a single form of art intervention with routine care or a blank control, and the relative efficacy of various art therapies remains unclear. To address this evidence gap, this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the intervention effectiveness of different art therapies among cancer survivors by synthesizing direct and indirect evidence. We ranked the interventions by their relative efficacy for outcome measures including anxiety, depression, quality of life, pain, and fatigue, aiming to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical practice.
Methods
This study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Network Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-NMA) guidelines ( 24 ) and the protocol registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD420251149102), which predefined the research plan for this review.
Literature search
A comprehensive computerized search was conducted across the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for RCTs examining the effects of various art therapies on the psychological well-being and quality of life in cancer survivors. The search covered articles published up to September 3, 2025. Search terms included “neoplasms”, “art”, “music”, and “painting”. Only articles written in English were retrieved. MeSH terms and free-text words were combined utilizing Boolean operators (AND, OR) to develop the search strategy, which was tailored to each database ( Supplementary Table 1 ). Additionally, reference lists of included studies were also searched to obtain additional data and avoid omissions.
Screening criteria
Inclusion criteria
Based on the PICOS search algorithm, inclusion criteria were established as follows (1): Participants: adult cancer survivors (defined as per NCCN guidelines) (2); Intervention: various art therapies (including music, dance, painting, etc.) (3); Comparison: routine care or any interventions that did not involve artistic media, such as health education or relaxation training (4); Outcomes: outcome variables included anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain, and quality of life. All included studies must report at least one of the above outcomes. The five outcome measures were pre-specified during the study design phase and were carefully selected with full consideration of clinical needs (5); Study design: RCT.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria comprised (1): Observational studies, letters, reviews, case reports, conference abstracts, letters to the editor, or editorials (2); Animal studies (3); Articles with incomplete or unavailable data (4); Articles for which the full text could not be retrieved (5); Articles reporting no relevant outcome measures (6); Articles with study designs that did not meet the prespecified requirements.
Literature screening
Two researchers (WQL and TY) independently screened the retrieved articles based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. First, duplicate articles were removed using EndNote 21. The remaining articles were then preliminarily reviewed by title and abstract review. Articles that could not be definitively excluded during the preliminary screening were included for full-text assessment. The two researchers independently re-screened the downloaded full texts to determine final eligibility for inclusion in this study. In the event of any disagreement at any screening stage, a third researcher (HY) was consulted, and the final decision was reached through discussion until consensus was reached to ensure objectivity and consistency in the screening process.
Data extraction
Two researchers (WQL and TY) independently screened and re-checked the articles according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, data were extracted from the included studies, including first author, publication year, region, sample size, grouping, age and gender distribution of participants, type of cancer, clinical staging, baseline treatment regimens, interventions and controls, and the outcome measurement tools in each study. All extracted data were cross-checked by two researchers. Discrepancies, if any, were addressed through discussion with a third researcher (HY) until consensus was reached, so as to ensure consistency and accuracy in data extraction.
Quality assessment
Two researchers (WQL and TY) independently assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool version 2.0 (ROB 2.0). The assessment covered five core domains (1): randomization process (2); deviations from intended interventions (3); missing outcome data (4); outcome measurement (5); selection of the reported result. Based on these five domains, the overall risk of bias for each study was further assessed and categorized into three levels: low risk of bias, some concerns, or high risk of bias. After completing independent assessments, the two researchers cross-checked the assessment results. In case of discrepancies, a third researcher (HY) participated in discussions until consensus was reached to ensure consistency and reliability of the assessment.
Statistical analysis
This study employed a Bayesian NMA utilizing Stata 15.0 and the gemtc package in R Studio 4.5.2 ( 25 , 26 ). Continuous variables were presented as standardized mean differences (SMD) and their 95% credible intervals (CrI). The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method was used for model construction, with 4 chains, 20,000 iterations, and a burn-in period of 5,000 iterations. Model convergence was assessed using a combination of the Brooks-Gelman-Rubin potential scale reduction factor (PSRF) and trace plots. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic ( 27 ): if I 2 > 50%, indicating high heterogeneity, a random-effects model was used; if I 2 < 50%, indicating no significant heterogeneity, a fixed-effects model was used ( 28 ). For outcome measures with high heterogeneity (I 2 > 50%), univariate meta-regression analyses were further conducted, using publication year, sample size, and gender ratio as covariates, to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. The criterion for determining whether a covariate has a significant moderating effect was whether the 95% CrI of the regression coefficient (B) contained 0. If a closed loop existed in the evidence network, the node-splitting method was used to assess the consistency between direct and indirect evidence. If the evidence network exhibited a star-shaped distribution and did not contain a closed loop, consistency model analysis was primarily based on the transitivity assumption. The relative efficacy of the interventions was presented in league tables, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were calculated to predict the probability ranking of the art therapies. A higher SUCRA value indicated a greater probability of the therapy being the most effective. Statistical inference for outcome measures was based on the posterior distribution. If the 95% CrI of the SMD did not contain the null value (0), the intervention effectiveness was considered statistically significant. Comparison-adjusted funnel plots combined with Egger’s test were used to quantitatively assess potential publication bias or small-sample effects. All ancillary analyses were conducted using two-sided tests, with P < 0.05 ( 29 ) defined as statistical significance. As a systematic review, this study did not involve the recruitment of or participation by patients or the public.
Sensitivity analysis
Given that some of the included studies did not fully report cancer staging, baseline treatment, or key characteristics of participants, which may increase clinical heterogeneity among studies and the risk of selection bias, targeted sensitivity analyses were further conducted. After excluding studies reporting incomplete data, an NMA was performed on the primary outcome measures to assess the stability of the effect direction, effect size, and SUCRA ranking results. If the results did not change substantially before and after exclusion, the results of the main analysis were considered to be robust.
Results
Literature screening results
The initial search yielded 11,171 articles. After removing 4,226 duplicates and excluding 6,908 articles based on title and abstract screening, 3 articles with no available full texts and 6 ineligible articles were further excluded. Ultimately, 28 articles were included. The detailed screening process is shown in Figure 1 .

Characteristics of included studies
The 28 included studies ( 22 , 23 , 31 – 56 ) involved 2,542 patients in total, including 670 males (26.36%), 1,870 females (73.56%), and 2 with other genders (0.08%). The included studies spanned from 2003 to 2025. Among them, 20 involved music therapy, 3 involved mandala painting therapy, 4 involved dance therapy, and 1 involved self-book therapy. The mean age range of patients was 43.5–66 years for the T (treatment) groups and 41.1–65 years for the C (control) groups. Overall, among the 2,542 patients included in the studies, breast cancer was the most common type of disease, followed by lung cancer, gastrointestinal tumors, hematological malignancies, and prostate cancer. Some studies did not specify the baseline treatment, cancer staging, or specific type of cancer, merely describing them as other cancers or advanced cancers. Additional information is presented in Table 1 .
Table 1
Summary of included studies.
| Study | Region | Participants (T/C) | Age(Mean ± SD) | Gender (M/F/other) | Cancer staging | Disease type | Baseline treatment | Treatment group | Control group | Evaluation tool | Provider | (Duration & frequency) |
| Havva2024 | Turkey | 60(30/30) | T:60.13 ± 10.77; C:61.07 ± 13.78 | T;15/15 C:18/12 | NA | Lung, cancer, Breast cancer, GI cancer, Other cancers | chemotherapy | Music therapy | routine care | BFI, STAI | professionals | 30 mins, 3 sessions |
| Felicity2023 | American | 708(376/332) | T:60.26 ± 12.43; C:60.54 ± 12.59 | T;135/240/1 C:112/220 | Stage0–IV | NA | chemotherapy | Music therapy | routine care | VAS, PANAS, Distress Thermometer | professionals | 60 min, 1 session |
| Francesco2014 | Italy | 52(26/26) | T:64.3 ± 12.9; C:64.6 ± 12.8 | T:1/25 C:8/18 | StageI-IV | NA | Pain relief | Music therapy | routine care | VAS-P, VAS-M | professionals | 30 mins, 4 sessions |
| Barrie2003 | American | 69(36/33) | T:53.0 ± 11.0; C:51.0 ± 12.0 | T:22/14; C:10/23 | Hematologic | Lymphoma, Multiple myeloma, Amyloidosis | High-dose therapy, Autologous stem cell transplantation | Music therapy | routine care | POMS | therapists | 30 mins, 5 sessions |
| Shu2019 | TW,China | 94(46/48) | T:51.16 ± 9.21; C:49.56 ± 9.78 | female-only | Stage0–IV | Breast Cancer | chemotherap, mastectomy | Music therapy | routine care | MFSI-SF, HADS | therapists | 45 mins, 1 session |
| Parvaneh2024 | Iran | 70(35/35) | GroupA:45.51 ± 9.32; GroupB:44.94 ± 9.98 | female-only | NA | Breast Cancer | chemotherapy | Mandala(Group A) | Sudoku (Group B) | STAI | professionals | 120 mins, 1 session |
| Ching2024 | TW,China | 128(63/65) | T:52.0 ± 10.0; C:53.2 ± 9.6 | female-only | Stage0–IV | Breast Cancer | mastectomy, chemotherapy, Radiation therapy | Music therapy | routine care | WHOQOL-BREF, STAI, BFI | professionals | 60 mins, 12 sessions |
| Suzanne2014 | American | 59(29/30) | T:50.2 ± 14.1; C:51.6 ± 13.8 | T:10/19; C:14/16 | Hematologic | Leukemia, Lymphoma, myeloma | local anesthesia for Bone Marrow Biopsy | Music therapy | routine care | STAI, VAS | professionals | 5-4 0mins, 1 session |
| Russell2003 | American | 80(40/40) | T:66 ± 12.2 C:65 ± 12.2 | T:20/20; C:20/20 | Stage IV | advanced-stage cancer | Routine hospice services | Music therapy | routine care | HQOLI-R | therapists | 30–45 mins, 2 sessions |
| Rainbow2016 | HK,China | 139(69/70) | T:48.6 ± 7.7; C:49.1 ± 8.7 | female-only | Stage0–III | Breast Cancer | mastectomy, chemotherapy, Radiation therapy | Dance therapy | routine care | HADS-A, HADS-D, BFI | therapists | 90 mins, 6 sessions |
| Talita2020 | Brazil | 33(16/17) | T:49.50 ± 10.65;C: 50.76 ± 9.45 | female-only | StageI-II | Breast Cancer | chemotherapy | Music therapy | routine care | WHOQOL, BAI | professionals | 30 mins, 3 sessions |
| Mei2010 | TW,China | 98(34/30/34) | Total:53.0 ± 12.5 | Group A:13/21; Group B:9/21; Group C:11/23 | StageI-IV | Breast cancer, lung cancer and other cancers | chemotherapy | Group A:Music therapy Group B:Verbal meditation | routine care | STAI | professionals | 60 mins, 1 session |
| Madison2021 | American | 44(24/20) | T:57.04 ± 12.13; C:52.85 ± 16.00 | T:(6/18);C:(5/14/1) | NA | Colon cancer, stomach cancer, and other cancers | surgery | Music therapy | routine care | GMS, VAS | therapists | 30 mins, 1 session |
| KIRTISHRI 2022 | American | 40(20/20) | T: 64.88 ± 6.23; C:62.13 ± 7.50 | Male- only | NA | prostatic cancer | surgery | Music therapy | routine care | STAI | professionals | 30 mins, 2 sessions |
| Murat2023 | Turkey | 60(30/30) | Frequency&Percentage T:26-35y: 3(10%) ;36-45y: 12(40%) ;46-65y: 11(36.7%) ;≥65y: 4(13.3%) C:26-35y: 6(20%) ;36-45y: 5(16.7%) ;46-65y: 13(43.3%) ;≥65y: 6(20%) | female-only | StageI-III | Breast cancer | surgery, chemotherapy | Ney Music therapy | routine care | VAS, BAI, FACT-G | professionals | 30 mins, 5 sessions |
| Clare2012 | Australian | 100(50/50) | T:57 ± 14.2; C:58 ± 12.7 | T:30/20; C:29/21 | NA | prostatic cancer, Breast cancer and other cancers | radiotherapy | Music therapy | routine care | STAI | Support Staff | 30 mins. 1 session |
| Friedeman2023 | German | 52(24/28) | T:60.5 ± 10.3; C:59.3 ± 11 | female-only | StageI-III | Breast Cancer | surgery, chemotherapy, Radiation therapy | Dance therapy | Routine care | CFS-D, EORTC QLQ-C30 | professional | 60 mins, 6 sessions |
| Donna2018 | American | 40(20/20) | T:51.95 ± 10.59; C:52.30 ± 12.42 | female-only | StageI-IV | Breast cancer, lung cancer and other cancers | chemotherapy, Radiation therapy | self book | Routine care | DT, PROMIS | therapists | 50 mins, 6 sessions |
| Tal2023 | Israel | 30(14/16) | Total:54.3 ± 11.5 | Total:2/28 | NA | Breast Cancer and other cancers | chemotherapy, bone marrow transplantation, biotherapy | Music therapy | Routine care | STAI, VAS | therapists | 60 mins, 1 session |
| Rajeev2025 | India | 44(22/22) | T:49.9 ± 13.8; C:49.1 ± 17.1 | T:12/10; C:12/10 | NA | GI cancer and other cancers | surgery | Music therapy | routine care | VAS, DASS-21 | professionals | 30 mins. 14 sessions |
| Huei2024 | TW,China | 100(50/50) | T:59.9 ± 9.6 C:60.3 ± 11.3 | T:25/25; C:23/27 | StageI-IV | Breast Cancer and other cancers | surgery, chemotherapy, Radiation therapy | Music therapy | routine care | BAI, DT | Support Staff | 10–15 mins. 140sessions |
| Yu2025 | TW,China | 66(33/33) | Total:53.2 ± 10.3 | female-only | Stage0–IV | Breast Cancer | Surgery, Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, Targeted therapy | Dance therapy | routine care | EORTC QLQ-C30 | professionals | 60 mins, 12 sessions |
| Kemik2025 | Turkey | 46(23/23) | NA | T:12/11; C:11/12 | Hematologic | Lymphoma, Multiple myeloma and other cancers | chemotherapy | Mandala | routine care | DT, STAI | professionals | 30 mins, 7 sessions |
| Pamela2011 | American | 30(15/15) | Total:56.63 | female-only | NA | Breast Cancer | Surgery | Music therapy | routine care | STAI | professionals | Perioperative, 1 session |
| Nasrin2025 | Iran | 70(35/35) | T:43.45 ± 8.03; C:44.00 ± 8.20 | female-only | StageI-III | Breast Cancer | surgery, chemotherapy, Radiation therapy | Mandala | routine care | EORTC QLQ-C30 | professionals | 45 mins, 6 sessions |
| Marta2015 | Hungary | 114(55/59) | T:48.87 ± 8.88 C:51.31 ± 11.06 | female-only | NA | Breast Cancer and other cancers | Chemotherapy, Hormone therapy, | Dance therapy | routine care | EORTC QLQ-C30 | professionals | 180 mins, 52 sessions |
| Maryam2023 | Iran | 54(25/29) | T:47.74 ± 13.96; C:41.14 ± 9.87 | T:4/21; C:4/25 | NA | Breast cancer, lung cancer and other cancers | Surgery, chemotherapy, Radiation therapy | Music therapy | routine care | STAI, VAS | professionals | 20 mins, 16 sessions |
| Ozgur2023 | Turkey | 62(32/30) | T:51.80 ± 3.62; C:53.35 ± 3.18 | T:19/13; C:18/12 | StageII-III | Colon cancer and Rectal adenocarcinoma | chemotherapy | Music therapy | routine care | STAI, BDI | professionals | 45 mins, 6 sessions |
Quality assessment
The quality of the 28 studies included was assessed utilizing the Cochrane ROB 2.0 tool. Among them, 9 studies were rated as overall low risk of bias, while 14 studies were rated as some concerns because they were rated as some concerns in at least 1 domain. Of the remaining 5 studies, 4 were rated as high risk primarily due to failure to clearly report the true randomization method or a lack of adequate measures for allocation concealment, and 1 was rated as high risk due to a 33% loss to follow-up rate and the absence of sensitivity analysis for processing missing data. The quality assessment results are depicted in Figure 2 .

Network diagrams
In the network diagrams, the nodes represented different art therapies included. Node size was proportional to the total sample size for each intervention, with larger nodes indicating greater cumulative sample size for that intervention. Solid lines between nodes indicated direct comparisons between two interventions in the original studies. Line thickness correlated positively with the number of studies involving the direct comparison between the two interventions, with thicker lines indicating a greater number of studies involving the pairwise comparison ( Figure 3 ).

NMA
Anxiety
The league table indicated no statistically significant differences between the interventions and control in the reduction of anxiety. Additional data are presented in Table 2 . The interventions were ranked by SUCRA value as follows: music therapy (67.4%) > meditation (62.3%) > speech therapy (57.6%) > Ney therapy (54.8%) > mandala painting therapy (48.2%) > dance therapy (42.4%) > routine care (36.5%) > Sudoku therapy (31.0%). The SUCRA ranking results suggested that music therapy (67.4%) was likely to rank high. However, since the league table showed no statistically significant differences among the interventions, this ranking should be considered only as exploratory and not as definitive evidence of superiority ( Figure 4 ).
Table 2
League table for anxiety.
| control | |||||||
| -0.05 (-35.33, 35.08) | dance | ||||||
| 9.23 (-0.21, 18.8) | 9.22 (-27.16, 46.01) | music | |||||
| 2.27 (-33.04, 37.23) | 2.12 (-47.64, 52.02) | -7.02 (-43.78, 29.16) | mandala | ||||
| -7.57 (-57.69, 42.27) | -7.58 (-68.12, 53.65) | -16.79 (-67.95, 33.9) | -9.79 (-45.34, 25.73) | sudoku | |||
| 7.18 (-23.93, 38.75) | 7.31 (-39.29, 54.75) | -2.04 (-33.15, 29.47) | 5.03 (-41.98, 52.28) | 14.85 (-43.66, 74.14) | verbal | ||
| 6.03 (-29.52, 41.19) | 6.05 (-43.94, 56.2) | -3.21 (-39.79, 33.14) | 3.81 (-45.9, 53.55) | 13.58 (-47.36, 74.47) | -1.22 (-48.56, 46.21) | ney | |
| 9.84 (-26.58, 46.1) | 9.71 (-40.11, 60.59) | 0.58 (-34.69, 35.63) | 7.63 (-43.26, 58.47) | 17.45 (-44.38, 79.67) | 2.66 (-44.41, 49.13) | 3.89 (-46.92, 54.18) | meditation |

Fatigue
The league table indicated that music therapy outperformed dance therapy (SMD = -5.73, 95% CrI: -4.63, -6.84) and routine care (SMD = -5.83, 95% CrI: -5.02, -6.65) in reducing fatigue. Additional data are presented in Table 3 . The interventions were ranked by SUCRA value as follows: music therapy (96.4%) > Tango therapy (64.8%) > dance therapy (23.0%) > routine care (15.8%). This suggested that music therapy may offer certain benefits in alleviating fatigue among cancer survivors ( Figure 5 ).
Table 3
League table for fatigue.
| control | |||
| 0.1 (-0.65, 0.85) | dance | ||
| 5.83 (5.02, 6.65) | 5.73 (4.63, 6.84) | music | |
| 3.09 (-1.14, 7.36) | 2.99 (-1.3, 7.33) | -2.74 (-7.06, 1.63) | tango |

Quality of Life
The league table indicated that, for improving the patients’ quality of life, mandala painting therapy outperformed routine care (SMD = 12.15, 95% CrI: 20.51, 3.76), dance therapy (SMD = 11.74, 95% CrI: 20.62, 2.92), and music therapy (SMD = 11.38, 95% CrI: 19.81, 2.91). Ney therapy was superior to routine care (SMD = 11.44, 95% CrI: 12.51, 10.36), dance therapy (SMD = 11.06, 95% CrI: 14.1, 8.0), and music therapy (SMD = 10.68, 95% CrI: 12.31, 9.04). Additional data are presented in Table 4 . The interventions were ranked by SUCRA value as follows: mandala painting therapy (88.8%) > Ney therapy (85.9%) > music therapy (37.3%) > dance therapy (25.2%) > routine care (12.8%). The SUCRA results indicated that mandala painting therapy ranked high in improving quality of life ( Figure 6 ).
Table 4
League table for quality of life.
| control | ||||
| -0.39 (-3.24, 2.47) | dance | |||
| -0.76 (-1.98, 0.46) | -0.38 (-3.47, 2.74) | music | ||
| -11.44 (-12.51, -10.36) | -11.06 (-14.1, -8) | -10.68 (-12.31, -9.04) | ney art | |
| -12.15 (-20.51, -3.76) | -11.74 (-20.62, -2.92) | -11.38 (-19.81, -2.91) | -0.7 (-9.12, 7.75) | mandala |

Pain
The league table showed no statistically significant differences between the interventions and control in the relief of pain. Additional data are presented in Table 5 . The interventions were ranked by SUCRA value as follows: music therapy (69.0%) > meditation (59.8%) > Ney therapy (45.7%) > dance therapy (42.0%) > routine care (33.5%). Music therapy ranked first in the SUCRA ranking. However, since none of the pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences, this result merely indicated its potential for clinical application ( Figure 7 ).
Table 5
League table for pain.
| control | ||||
| 0.67 (-38.64, 39.83) | dance | |||
| 9.09 (-5.64, 24.62) | 8.46 (-33.15, 50.99) | music | ||
| 2.24 (-36.19, 41.04) | 1.5 (-52.86, 56.74) | -6.85 (-48.33, 34.57) | ney | |
| 8.36 (-33.28, 50.66) | 7.73 (-49.17, 65.66) | -0.74 (-39.76, 38.71) | 6.27 (-51.06, 62.87) | meditation |

Depression
The league table indicated that, for reducing depressive symptoms among cancer survivors, music therapy demonstrated greater efficacy than routine care (SMD = -1.71, 95% CrI: -1.15, -2.26) and dance therapy (SMD = -2.0, 95% CrI: -0.64, -3.37). Self-book therapy also outperformed routine care (SMD = -1.70, 95% CrI: -0.12, -3.11). Mandala painting therapy demonstrated superior performance in all pairwise comparisons, exhibiting significantly greater efficacy than routine care (SMD = -3.95, 95% CrI: -2.93, -4.97), dance therapy (SMD = -4.25, 95% CrI: -2.65, -5.87), music therapy (SMD = -2.25, 95% CrI: -1.09, -3.4), self-book therapy (SMD = -2.35, 95% CrI: -0.54, -4.16), and meditation therapy (SMD = -2.85, 95% CrI: -0.8, -4.88). Additional data are presented in Table 6 . The interventions were ranked by SUCRA value as follows: mandala painting therapy (99.8%) > music therapy (66.2%) > meditation (61.5%) > self-book therapy (47.3%) > dance therapy (9.0%) > routine care (16.1%). These results suggested that mandala painting therapy may be a superior intervention for alleviating depressive symptoms in cancer survivors ( Figure 8 ).
Table 6
League table for depression.
| control | |||||
| -0.3 (-1.56, 0.95) | dance | ||||
| 1.71 (1.15, 2.26) | 2 (0.65, 3.37) | music | |||
| 1.6 (0.12, 3.11) | 1.9 (-0.05, 3.86) | -0.1 (-1.69, 1.51) | selfbook | ||
| 1.11 (-0.65, 2.87) | 1.4 (-0.74, 3.57) | -0.6 (-2.27, 1.08) | -0.5 (-2.8, 1.81) | meditation | |
| 3.95 (2.93, 4.97) | 4.25 (2.65, 5.87) | 2.25 (1.09, 3.4) | 2.35 (0.54, 4.16) | 2.85 (0.8, 4.88) | mandala |

Results of heterogeneity, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses
The comparison between music therapy and routine care revealed high heterogeneity in anxiety (I 2 = 96.9%), pain (I 2 = 94.5%), and quality of life (I 2 = 80.6%) outcomes ( Supplementary Figure 1 - S13 ), with low heterogeneity in other outcomes. Since no closed loops were formed among the five outcomes included in this study for any intervention, it was impossible to perform an inconsistency test. Given the high heterogeneity observed in the outcomes of anxiety, pain, and quality of life, sensitivity analyses and meta-regression analyses were conducted. Following the exclusion of studies reporting incomplete data, the heterogeneity in anxiety and quality of life outcomes decreased (I 2 = 66.7% and 80.5%, respectively), but remained high. For the outcome of pain, sensitivity analysis was not conducted because the original network became incomplete after the exclusion, making it impossible to perform valid network comparisons. Overall, after the exclusion, the effect direction, 95% CrI of pooled effect sizes, and SUCRA ranking did not have substantial changes for the outcomes of anxiety and quality of life. Additionally, univariate meta-regression analyses were conducted using the publication year, sample size, and gender ratio as covariates. The results showed that the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the regression coefficients (B) of all covariates contained 0, suggesting no statistical association between these covariates and the effect size. The analysis indicated that publication year, sample size, and gender ratio may not be the primary sources of heterogeneity.
Publication bias
The comparison-adjusted funnel plots ( Figure 9 ) showed a certain degree of asymmetry in the scatter plots for the outcomes of anxiety ( Figure 9A ) and pain ( Figure 9D ). Meanwhile, the results of Egger’s test were statistically significant (P = 0.0048 and P = 0.0457, respectively), suggesting that publication bias or small-sample effects may be present for these outcomes. For the outcomes of fatigue, depression, and quality of life, due to the small number of included studies ( Figures 9B, C, E ), the funnel plots showed a limited number of scattered points and failed to form a stable distribution pattern. Furthermore, the prerequisites for the application of Egger’s test were not met. Therefore, no further quantitative tests were conducted. Overall, some outcome measures in this study may be subject to a certain risk of publication bias, and such bias may influence the estimated effect sizes. Therefore, the study results should be interpreted with caution in the context of clinical practice.

Discussion
This study is the first to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of various art therapies for anxiety, depression, pain, fatigue, and quality of life among cancer survivors. The NMA revealed a positive effect of art therapy on some psychological outcomes and the quality of life, consistent with the findings of previous studies ( 14 , 54 , 57 , 58 ). From a mechanistic perspective, according to the gate control theory ( 59 ), musical stimuli can interfere with the transmission of pain signals. At the neurochemical level, pleasant music can induce the release of endogenous opioid peptides and dopamine, activate the brain’s reward system, and elevate the pain threshold ( 60 ). Meanwhile, music may also alleviate an individual’s stress response and psychological distress from a neuroimmunological perspective ( 61 ) by modulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and reducing cortisol levels ( 62 ). Mandala painting therapy can guide individuals into a “flow” state through structured symmetrical patterns, downregulate the excessive activation of the default-mode network (DMN), thereby reducing rumination associated with depression ( 63 ) and promoting emotional regulation ( 64 ). Active creation also helps enhance self-efficacy and alleviate learned helplessness ( 65 ). These findings suggest that different art therapies may exert therapeutic effects on cancer survivors through distinct psychoneurobiological pathways.
In this study, the outcomes of anxiety, pain, and quality of life exhibited high heterogeneity, suggesting that the effectiveness of art therapy may be jointly influenced by multiple factors. Compared to pharmacological interventions, art therapy is inherently highly individualized and context-dependent. Significant differences are found across studies in terms of intervention form, administration frequency, duration, setting, and the professional background of practitioners. Furthermore, the psychological processing pathways activated by different art media are not entirely consistent, which may also lead to inconsistent effectiveness across different outcome measures. Regarding pain, the subjective nature of pain perception and its susceptibility to multiple factors, such as cancer type, disease stage, analgesic regimens, and individual psychological states, may further increase heterogeneity among studies. Moreover, insufficient reporting of cancer staging, baseline treatments, and patient clinical characteristics in some studies, along with measurement discrepancies arising from the use of different scale instruments, may further contribute to clinical heterogeneity across studies. Nevertheless, following sensitivity analyses, the overall effect direction and the SUCRA ranking did not change significantly, suggesting that the results of the main analysis remained relatively robust. Furthermore, we observed that in the 28 included studies, approximately 64% of art interventions were administered by trained healthcare professionals, suggesting that a healthcare professional-led model appears to be feasible and has the potential for widespread adoption for integrating art therapy into routine clinical practice. Given its non-invasiveness, relatively low costs, and high patient acceptability ( 66 ), art therapy has the potential to serve as an important adjunct to comprehensive supportive care for cancer survivors.
The included studies spanned diverse cultural contexts, with more than half originating from non-Western countries. Individuals from different cultural backgrounds may differ in their perception, expression, and coping styles regarding psychological states and somatic symptoms. This cultural heterogeneity may, to some extent, influence the effectiveness of art therapy interventions. Previous studies have shown that in Western cultural contexts, music is more frequently viewed as a “psychological placebo” for alleviating acute psychological stress. Its effects primarily manifest as immediate emotional improvement and relief from subjective distress, while its efficacy in alleviating fatigue and physical pain may be relatively limited ( 67 ). In contrast, patients from Eastern cultural backgrounds tend to express psychological distress through somatization ( 68 ) and may interpret the experience of fatigue as a depletion of “Qi” or vital energy. Culturally specific musical forms, such as Sufi music centered on the Ney flute, may further enhance psychological comfort and spiritual support by evoking deeper emotional resonance and cultural identity, thereby exerting a more pronounced effect on outcomes such as fatigue ( 15 ). Future research should focus more on cultural adaptability to optimize therapeutic efficacy.
Although this study provides the first systematic framework for comparing the efficacy of various art therapies, several limitations exist that require cautious interpretation. First, the search does not include gray literature or non-English publications, and the evidence is highly concentrated in Asia and North America, which may affect the global generalizability of the findings. Second, differences in patient clinical characteristics, measurement tools, intervention protocols, and assessment time points across studies may lead to high heterogeneity. Some original trials fail to explicitly report cancer staging or baseline treatment regimens. The evidence network exhibits a star-shaped structure, suggesting that current effect sizes may only reflect averaged effects. Although SMDs were used to synthesize data from different scales, differences in symptom sensitivity and weighting of somatization symptoms across scales may also contribute to heterogeneity. Furthermore, the lack of standardization in interventions and the wide range of assessment time points may have diluted short-term benefits. Therefore, future studies should establish standardized intervention and assessment frameworks, clearly define measurement time points for both the acute and maintenance phases, and provide more reliable evidence-based grounds for comparing different art therapies.
Conclusion
Art interventions are gaining increasing attention in cancer supportive care. This study provides preliminary evidence-based findings through an NMA, which indicates that various art therapies may offer potential benefits in improving the psychological well-being and reducing the symptom burden of cancer survivors. However, given the star-shaped structure of the existing evidence network and the presence of clinical heterogeneity, the cumulative probability ranking should be interpreted as exploratory guidance rather than definitive conclusions. Additional high-quality, standardized, multi-arm head-to-head RCTs are required in the future to further validate the efficacy of art therapy. In clinical practice, healthcare professionals should take into account patients’ cultural backgrounds, personal preferences, and disease stage to carefully design individualized art intervention plans, thereby maximizing benefits for patients’ physical and mental well-being.
Edited by: María Cantero-García , Universidad a Distancia de Madrid, Spain
Reviewed by: Yoshihiro Noda , IUHW Mita Hospital, Japan
Nurul Huda , Riau University, Indonesia
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
QW: Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Formal Analysis. YT: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. YH: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. BH: Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1817092/full#supplementary-material
References
1 Engelman B Pratt-Chapman ML Mead KH Wang Y Arem H . The association between a patient-centered quality of care index and self-efficacy among cancer survivors . J Cancer Surviv . ( 2025 ) 19 : 1666–74 . doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01581-8 38589757
2 Mayer DK Nasso SF Earp JA . Defining cancer survivors, their needs, and perspectives on survivorship health care in the USA . Lancet Oncol . ( 2017 ) 18 : e11–8 . doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30573-3 28049573
3 Podina IR Todea D Fodor LA . Fear of cancer recurrence and mental health: A comprehensive meta-analysis . Psychooncology . ( 2023 ) 32 : 1503–13 . doi: 10.1002/pon.6205 37596855
4 Ge MW Sheng J Shen LT Hu FH Jia YJ Ur-Rehman A . Global prevalence of mental health problems among cancer survivors: A meta-analysis from 31 countries . Psychooncology . ( 2025 ) 34 : e70077 . doi: 10.1002/pon.70077 39780039
5 Wang HQ Lin H Liu B . Research progress on the psychological burden and intervention measures in cancer patients . Front Psychiatry . ( 2024 ) 15 : 1408762 . doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1408762 38938456 PMC11208330
6 Adamakidou T Papadopoulou A Govina OD Mantzorou M Apostolara P Drakopoulou M . CN48 - Exploring anxiety, depression and quality of life of ambulatory cancer patients during chemotherapy . Ann Oncol . ( 2019 ) 30 : v829–30 . doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz275.003
7 Fardell JE Irwin CM Vardy JL Bell ML . Anxiety, depression, and concentration in cancer survivors: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey results . Support Care Cancer . ( 2023 ) 31 : 272 . doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07710-w 37060376 PMC10105664
8 Cheng C Elamin ME May H Kennedy M . Drawing on emotions: The evolving role of art therapy . Ir J Psychol Med . ( 2023 ) 40 : 500–2 . doi: 10.1017/ipm.2021.20 33870885
9 Shukla A Choudhari SG Gaidhane AM Quazi Syed Z . Role of art therapy in the promotion of mental health: A critical review . Cureus . ( 2022 ) 14 : e28026 . doi: 10.7759/cureus.28026 36134083 PMC9472646
10 Zhou S Yu M Zhou Z Wang L Liu W Dai Q . The effects of art therapy on quality of life and psychosomatic symptoms in adults with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis . BMC Complement Med Ther . ( 2023 ) 23 : 434 . doi: 10.1186/s12906-023-04258-4 38041063 PMC10691094
11 Huang T Yin X . Exploring the benefits of art therapy for anxiety and depression in women with breast cancer: A meta-analytical systematic review . J Psychiatr Res . ( 2025 ) 189 : 403–14 . doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.05.027 40582080
12 Lusebrink VB . Assessment and therapeutic application of the expressive therapies continuum: Implications for brain structures and functions . Art Ther . ( 2010 ) 27 : 168–77 . doi: 10.1080/07421656.2010.10129380 37339054
13 Bradt J Dileo C Grocke D Magill L . Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in cancer patients . Cochrane Database Syst Rev . ( 2011 ): Cd006911 . doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub2 21833957
14 Xu Z Liu C Fan W Li S Li Y . Effect of music therapy on anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis . Sci Rep . ( 2024 ) 14 : 16532 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66836-x 39019965 PMC11255342
15 Gurbuz-Dogan RN Ali A Candy B King M . The effectiveness of Sufi music for mental health outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomised trials . Complement Ther Med . ( 2021 ) 57 : 102664 . doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2021.102664 33465384
16 Bradt J Shim M Goodill SW . Dance/movement therapy for improving psychological and physical outcomes in cancer patients . Cochrane Database Syst Rev . ( 2015 ) 1 : Cd007103 . doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007103.pub3 25565627 PMC7204197
17 Abu-Odah H Wang M Su JJ Collard-Stokes G Sheffield D Molassiotis A . Effectiveness of dance movement therapy and dance movement interventions on cancer patients' health-related outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis . Support Care Cancer . ( 2024 ) 32 : 235 . doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08431-4 38502260
18 Chen Y Fu Y Guo X Mu X Duan Y Shen J . Mandala painting therapy applied to cancer patient: A scoping review . Support Care Cancer . ( 2025 ) 33 : 875 . doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09884-x 40991014 PMC12460571
19 Gantt L Tinnin LW . Support for a neurobiological view of trauma with implications for art therapy . Arts Psychother . ( 2009 ) 36 : 148–53 . doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2008.12.005 38826717
20 Collie K Bottorff JL Long BC . A narrative view of art therapy and art making by women with breast cancer . J Health Psychol . ( 2006 ) 11 : 761–75 . doi: 10.1177/1359105306066632 16908471
21 O'Steen L Lockney NA Morris CG Johnson-Mallard V Pereira D Amdur RJ . A prospective randomized trial of the influence of music on anxiety in patients starting radiation therapy for cancer . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys . ( 2021 ) 109 : 670–4 . doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.048 33121861
22 Danhauer SC Vishnevsky T Campbell CR McCoy TP Tooze JA Kanipe KN . Music for patients with hematological Malignancies undergoing bone marrow biopsy: A randomized controlled study of anxiety, perceived pain, and patient satisfaction . J Soc Integr Oncol . ( 2010 ) 8 : 140–7 . PMC3947526 24619452
23 Ho RT Fong TC Cheung IK Yip PS Luk MY . Effects of a short-term dance movement therapy program on symptoms and stress in patients with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial . J Pain Symptom Manage . ( 2016 ) 51 : 824–31 . doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.332 26975625
24 Hutton B Salanti G Caldwell DM Chaimani A Schmid CH Cameron C . The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: Checklist and explanations . Ann Intern Med . ( 2015 ) 162 : 777–84 . doi: 10.7326/m14-2385 26030634
25 van Valkenhoef G Dias S Ades AE Welton NJ . Automated generation of node-splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta-analysis . Res Synth Methods . ( 2016 ) 7 : 80 – 93 . doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1167 26461181 PMC5057346
26 Shim SR Kim SJ Lee J Rücker G . Network meta-analysis: Application and practice using R software . Epidemiol Health . ( 2019 ) 41 : e2019013 . doi: 10.4178/epih.e2019013 30999733 PMC6635665
27 Higgins JP Thompson SG Deeks JJ Altman DG . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses . Bmj . ( 2003 ) 327 : 557–60 . doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 12958120 PMC192859
28 Huedo-Medina TB Sánchez-Meca J Marín-Martínez F Botella J . Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index ? Psychol Methods . ( 2006 ) 11 : 193 – 206 . doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.11.2.193 16784338
29 Wasserstein RL Lazar NA . The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose . Am Stat . ( 2016 ) 70 : 129–33 . doi: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108 37339054
30 Page MJ McKenzie JE Bossuyt PM . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews . BMJ . ( 2021 ) 372 : n71 . doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71 33782057 PMC8005924
31 Mollaog Lu MC Mollaog Lu S Akin EB Mollaog Lu M Yanmiş S . The effect of art therapy on pain, emesis, anxiety, and quality of life in operated breast cancer patients: Randomized control trials . J Integr Complement Med . ( 2024 ) 30 : 371–82 . doi: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0062 37824754
32 Gezgin Yazıcı H Ökten Ç Karabulut E Aliustaoğlu M . Effect of music on anxiety and fatigue in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A randomized controlled trial . Arch Iran Med . ( 2024 ) 27 : 611–7 . doi: 10.34172/aim.31258 39534995 PMC11558607
33 Harper FWK Heath AS Moore TF Kim S Heath EI . Using music as a tool for distress reduction during cancer chemotherapy treatment . JCO Oncol Pract . ( 2023 ) 19 : 1133–42 . doi: 10.1200/op.22.00814 37433094 PMC10732503
34 Burrai F Micheluzzi V Bugani V . Effects of live sax music on various physiological parameters, pain level, and mood level in cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial . Holist Nurs Pract . ( 2014 ) 28 : 301–11 . doi: 10.1097/hnp.0000000000000041 25099983
35 Cassileth BR Vickers AJ Magill LA . Music therapy for mood disturbance during hospitalization for autologous stem cell transplantation: A randomized controlled trial . Cancer . ( 2003 ) 98 : 2723–9 . doi: 10.1002/cncr.11842 14669295
36 Chen SC Yeh ML Chang HJ Lin MF . Music, heart rate variability, and symptom clusters: A comparative study . Support Care Cancer . ( 2020 ) 28 : 351–60 . doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04817-x 31049671
37 Cheraghi P Hekmatpour D Rafiei F Ansari J . A comparison between effects of sudoku and mandala painting on anxiety of breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy . J Family Med Prim Care . ( 2024 ) 13 : 431–7 . doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_411_23 38605776 PMC11006075
38 Chuang CH Chen CH . The effects of music intervention on quality of life, anxiety, and fatigue among patients with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial . Oncol Nurs Forum . ( 2024 ) 51 : 467–82 . doi: 10.1188/24.Onf.467-482 39162790
39 Hilliard RE . The effects of music therapy on the quality and length of life of people diagnosed with terminal cancer . J Music Ther . ( 2003 ) 40 : 113–37 . doi: 10.1093/jmt/40.2.113 14505443
40 Lima TU Moura ECR Oliveira CMB Leal R Nogueira Neto J Pereira EC . Impact of a music intervention on quality of life in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A randomized clinical trial . Integr Cancer Ther . ( 2020 ) 19 : 1534735420938430 . doi: 10.1177/1534735420938430 32618212 PMC7491226
41 Lin MF Hsieh YJ Hsu YY Fetzer S Hsu MC . A randomised controlled trial of the effect of music therapy and verbal relaxation on chemotherapy-induced anxiety . J Clin Nurs . ( 2011 ) 20 : 988–99 . doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03525.x 21385249
42 Mishra K Jesse E Bukavina L Sopko E Arojo I Fernstrum A . Impact of music on postoperative pain, anxiety, and narcotic use after robotic prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial . J Adv Pract Oncol . ( 2022 ) 13 : 121–6 . doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2022.13.2.3 35369398 PMC8955566
43 SChad F Rieser T Becker S Groß J Matthes H Oei SL . Efficacy of Tango Argentino for cancer-associated fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial . Cancers (Basel) . ( 2023 ) 15 . doi: 10.3390/cancers15112920 37296883 PMC10251919
44 Binns-Turner PG Wilson LL Pryor ER Boyd GL Prickett CA . Perioperative music and its effects on anxiety, hemodynamics, and pain in women undergoing mastectomy . Aana J . ( 2011 ) 79 : S21–7 . 22403963
45 Tanriverdi O Karaoglu T Aydemir FN . Can music and medicine be effective on anxiety, depression and chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting? (PEGASUS study) . Indian J Cancer . ( 2023 ) 60 : 282–91 . doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_387_20 37530254
46 Szalai M Lévay B Szirmai A Papp I Prémusz V Bódis J . A clinical study to assess the efficacy of belly dancing as a tool for rehabilitation in female patients with Malignancies . Eur J Oncol Nurs . ( 2015 ) 19 : 60–5 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.07.009 25201130
47 Merry M Silverman MJ . Effects of patient-preferred live music on positive and negative affect and pain with adults on a post-surgical oncology unit: A randomized study . Arts Psychother . ( 2021 ) 72 : 101739 . doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2020.101739 38826717
48 O'Callaghan C Sproston M Wilkinson K Willis D Milner A Grocke D . Effect of self-selected music on adults' anxiety and subjective experiences during initial radiotherapy treatment: A randomised controlled trial and qualitative research . J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol . ( 2012 ) 56 : 473–7 . doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02395.x 22883658
49 Yang HF Chang WW Chou YH Huang JY Liao YS Liao TE . Impact of background music listening on anxiety in cancer patients undergoing initial radiation therapy: A randomized clinical trial . Radiat Oncol . ( 2024 ) 19 : 73 . doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02460-3 38862982 PMC11167881
50 Yang YH Chao YL Lin YF Liu PC Chang KJ Hou IC . Home-based remote dance program with biopsychosocial model improves quality of life in breast cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial . J Bodyw Mov Ther . ( 2025 ) 43 : 376–85 . doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.04.029 40483151
51 Radl D Vita M Gerber N Gracely EJ Bradt J . The effects of Self-Book(©) art therapy on cancer-related distress in female cancer patients during active treatment: A randomized controlled trial . Psychooncology . ( 2018 ) 27 : 2087–95 . doi: 10.1002/pon.4758 29744966
52 Rabinowitch TC Dassa A Sadot AS Trincher A . Outcomes and experiences of an online Balance-Space music therapy intervention for cancer patients: A mixed methods study . Arts Psychother . ( 2023 ) 82 : 101998 . doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2023.101998 36713463 PMC9873370
53 Ranjan R Jaiswal Y Mallik S Varghese NJ Pandey JK Kumar P . Efficacy of music therapy in reducing anxiety among postsurgical cancer patients: An open-label randomized controlled trial . Cureus . ( 2025 ) 17 : e83392 . doi: 10.7759/cureus.83392 40462786 PMC12131106
54 Dadashi N Khanali Mojen L Ilkhani M Nasirie M Mirzaee HR Boozaripour M . Effect of Mandala Art Therapy on quality of life in breast cancer patients . Asian Pac J Cancer Prev . ( 2025 ) 26 : 2533–40 . doi: 10.31557/apjcp.2025.26.7.2533 40729075 PMC12510120
55 Ayşenur Çetin Üçeriz RPB . The effect of art-based Mandala on mental health among patients transplanting bone marrow: A randomized controlled study . Mediterr Nurs Midwifery . ( 2025 ) 5 : 102–13 . doi: 10.4274/MNM.2024.24248
56 Tollabzadeh M RAR Behzadipour S . The effect of music therapy on pain, anxiety, perceived stress, and biochemical parameters in hospitals among patients with cancer . Shiraz E-Med J . ( 2023 ) 24 : e137504 . doi: 10.5812/semj-137504
57 Li Y Xing X Shi X Yan P Chen Y Li M . The effectiveness of music therapy for patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis . J Adv Nurs . ( 2020 ) 76 : 1111–23 . doi: 10.1111/jan.14313 32017183
58 Trigueros-Murillo A Martinez-Calderon J Casuso-Holgado MJ González-García P Heredia-Rizo AM . Correction to: Effects of music-based interventions on cancer-related pain, fatigue, and distress: An overview of systematic reviews . Support Care Cancer . ( 2024 ) 32 : 268 . doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08478-3 38578447 PMC10997524
59 Melzack R Wall PD . Pain mechanisms: A new theory . Science . ( 1965 ) 150 : 971–9 . doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971 5320816
60 Putkinen V Seppälä K Harju H Hirvonen J Karlsson HK Nummenmaa L . Pleasurable music activates cerebral µ-opioid receptors: A combined PET-fMRI study . Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging . ( 2025 ) 52 : 3540–9 . doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07232-z 40183950 PMC12316753
61 Fancourt D Ockelford A Belai A . The psychoneuroimmunological effects of music: A systematic review and a new model . Brain Behavior Immun . ( 2014 ) 36 : 15 – 26 . doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.10.014 24157429
62 Thaut MH . Music as therapy in early history . Prog Brain Res . ( 2015 ) 217 : 143–58 . doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2014.11.025 25725914
63 Hamilton JP Farmer M Fogelman P Gotlib IH . Depressive rumination, the default-mode network, and the dark matter of clinical neuroscience . Biol Psychiatry . ( 2015 ) 78 : 224–30 . doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.02.020 25861700 PMC4524294
64 Lynch CJ Blackmore PF Johnson EH Wange RL Krone PK Exton JH . Guanine nucleotide binding regulatory proteins and adenylate cyclase in livers of streptozotocin- and BB/Wor-diabetic rats. Immunodetection of Gs and Gi with antisera prepared against synthetic peptides . J Clin Invest . ( 1989 ) 83 : 2050–62 . doi: 10.1172/jci114116 2498395 PMC303930
65 Puetz TW Morley CA Herring MP . Effects of creative arts therapies on psychological symptoms and quality of life in patients with cancer . JAMA Intern Med . ( 2013 ) 173 : 960–9 . doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.836 23699646
66 Hu J Zhang J Hu L Yu H Xu J . Art therapy: A complementary treatment for mental disorders . Front Psychol . ( 2021 ) 12 : 686005 . doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686005 34456801 PMC8397377
67 Bradt J Dileo C Myers-Coffman K Biondo J . Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in people with cancer . Cochrane Database Syst Rev . ( 2021 ) 10 : Cd006911 . doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub4 34637527 PMC8510511
68 Ryder AG Yang J Zhu X Yao S Yi J Heine SJ . The cultural shaping of depression: Somatic symptoms in China, psychological symptoms in North America ? J Abnorm Psychol . ( 2008 ) 117 : 300–13 . doi: 10.1037/0021-843x.117.2.300 18489206