MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00414-016-1522-1

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of legal medicine · 2017

Comparison of macroscopic and microscopic (stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy) features of bone lesions due to hatchet hacking trauma.

Nogueira Luísa, Quatrehomme Gérald, Bertrand Marie-France, Rallon Christophe, Ceinos Romain, du Jardin Philippe, Adalian Pascal, Alunni Véronique

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This experimental study examined the lesions produced by a hatchet on human bones (tibiae). A total of 30 lesions were produced and examined macroscopically (naked eye) and by stereomicroscopy. 13 of them were also analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. The general shape of the lesion, both edges, both walls, the kerf floor and the extremities were described. The length and maximum width of the lesions were also recorded. The microscopic analysis of the lesions led to the description of a sharp-blunt mechanism. Specific criteria were identified (lateral pushing back, fragmentation of the upraising, fossa dug laterally to the edge and vertical striae) enabling the forensic expert to conclude that a hacking instrument was used. These criteria are easily identifiable using scanning electron microscopy, but can also be observed with stereomicroscopy. Overall, lateral pushing back and vertical striae visible using stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy signal the use of a hacking tool.

Для цитирования: Nogueira Luísa, Quatrehomme Gérald, Bertrand Marie-France, Rallon Christophe, Ceinos Romain, du Jardin Philippe, Adalian Pascal, Alunni Véronique. Comparison of macroscopic and microscopic (stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy) features of bone lesions due to hatchet hacking trauma.. International journal of legal medicine. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-016-1522-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.