MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.14694/edbook_am.2013.33.469

Медицинская библиотека · American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2013

Selecting the best drugs for phase I clinical development and beyond.

Loong Herbert H, Siu Lillian L

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Attrition rates of drugs from human entry to regulatory approval are far higher in anticancer drugs than those for nononcology indications. In the era of molecular therapeutics that results from a deeper understanding in cancer biology and advancing technologies, the number of compounds available for clinical testing is likely to continue to increase. Although the main objectives of phase I trials are to characterize toxicities of new agents and to determine the recommended dose for phase II development, most phase I studies are now designed to provide some early signal on preliminary efficacy as secondary objectives. The "go-no-go" decision to further develop a drug, or not, is now often pushed forward to the phase I setting. Thus, there is a need for investigators to be able to critically review the preclinical data available in order to determine which drugs should advance on the developmental path. This review highlights the intrinsic characteristics of a drug and the relevant data to be collected during its preclinical assessment, which may maximize the chances of success in clinical testing and eventual regulatory approval.

Для цитирования: Loong Herbert H, Siu Lillian L. Selecting the best drugs for phase I clinical development and beyond.. American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting. 2013. DOI: 10.14694/edbook_am.2013.33.469.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.